The Herald & Weekly Times Ltd and Another v Popovic9 VR 1
Defamation - Defences - Qualified privilege - Extended defence - Discussion of government and political matter - Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Scope of defence - Reasonableness of publication - Trial by judge and jury - Functions of judge and jury - Issue of reasonableness left to jury - Jury finding publication reasonable - Question of law for determination by judge - Appeal disposed of on basis of procedure adopted at trial - Criticism of magistrate concerning management of isolated proceeding - Distorted reproduction of hearing transcript - Whether plaintiff should have been given an opportunity to respond to proposed allegations - No basis for criticism had transcript been reproduced accurately - Evidence establishing publication not reasonable - Defence not maintainable.
Defamation - Defences - Justification - Defendants denying plaintiff's meanings and setting up Hore-Lacy form of defence - Judge misdirecting jury - Tactical choice by defence counsel - No miscarriage of justice - Defendants' imputations substantially different - Defence not maintainable.
Defamation - Defences - Comment - Honest belief - Belief in comment intended or comment actually conveyed - Judge misdirecting jury - Whether miscarriage of justice - Facts not truly stated - Defence not maintainable.
Defamation - Damages - Aggravated damages - Assessment - Criteria - Defendants' misconduct - Defendants persisting in defences - Failure to retract and apologise before verdict - Unjustifiable attacks on plaintiff's credit.
Defamation - Damages - Exemplary damages - Assessment - Award for defendants' post-verdict conduct - Public statements claiming victory in litigation after jury answers received but before resolution of competing motions for judgment - No contumelious disregard of plaintiff's rights - Award set aside.
Practice and procedure - Case management - Trial by judge and jury - Complex defamation trial - Plaintiff agreeing to all defences going to the jury - Reservation of leave to plaintiff to move for judgment non obstante veredicto - Whether power to reserve leave over defendants' objection - Applicability of cases decided before 1986 revision of the Rules - Desirability of trial judge adopting commonsense practical approach to entry of judgment - Supreme Court Rules Ch 1, rr 1.14 47.02 47.04 49.01 59.01