Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

75 VR(14 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Tanah Merah Vic Pty Ltd v Owners’ Corp75 VR 1

[2021] VSCA 72·Beach and Osborn JJA, Stynes AJA·26 Mar 2021·Court of Appeal

Building contractsStatutory warranties — Breach by builder of warranties — Use of non-compliant cladding on exterior of building — Claim by owners against builder — Whether claim apportionable — Whether claim against builder a claim for failure to take reasonable care — Claim by owners against other parties including consultants to builder — Whether concurrent wrongdoers — Building Code of Australia, cl C1.12 — Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), ss 24AF, 24AH, 24AI — Building Act 1993 (Vic), s 16

NegligenceProfessional services — Peer professional opinion — Whether opinion unreasonable — Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), s 59

Words and phrases‘bonded laminated materials’ — ‘laminate’

Movel (pseudonym) v The King75 VR 62

[2024] VSCA 183·Priest, Niall and Orr JJA·26 Aug 2024·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Sexual assault of a child under 16 years — Directions to jury — Comments by trial judge during course of directions regarding child witnesses — Whether irregularity — Jury Directions Act 2015 (Vic), s 44N(4)

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Sexual assault of a child under 16 years — Decision by trial judge to permit jury access to recordings of evidence of child complainant — Whether irregularity — Whether fundamental irregularity — Whether substantial miscarriage of justice — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), s 223

Waldron v O'Callaghan75 VR 138

[2024] VSCA 196·Ferguson CJ, Macaulay JA and Tsalamandris AJA·10 Sept 2024·Court of Appeal

Limitation of actionsNegligence — Personal injury — Doctor and patient — Whether personal injury claim statute-barred — Point in time at which cause of action ‘discoverable’ — Whether patient had knowledge, or ought to have known, that injury was caused by ‘fault’ of doctor — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 27D, 27F

Limitation of actionsExtension of limitation period — Whether extension just and reasonable — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 27K, 27L

AppealAppeal from exercise of judicial discretion — Extension of limitation period — Standard of review on appeal — Whether subject to correctness standard

Words and phrases‘date of discoverability’ — ‘fault’

Re Mokbel (No 2)75 VR 164

[2024] VSC 39·Fullerton J·12 Feb 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria

Criminal lawEvidence — Admissibility — Privilege – Evidence given, or document produced, to a Royal Commission — Use immunity — Use in subsequent proceedings — Scope of immunity — Whether evidence admissible to impugn credibility of witness — Inquiries Act 2014 (Vic), ss 33, 40

Words and phrases‘against the person’ — ‘other proceedings’

Grand Ridge Plantations Pty Ltd v Valuer-General75 VR 185

[2024] VSC 129·Richards J·22 Mar 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria

Local governmentRating — Valuation — Applicant occupied land as lessee under the Forests Act 1958 (Vic) or licensed to it under the Victorian Plantations Corporation Act 1993 (Vic) — Applicant liable to pay municipal rates on land based on ‘capital improved value’ of land — Whether ‘forest produce’ on land formed part of land for the purposes of assessing ‘capital improved value’ — Valuation of Land Act 1960 (Vic), s 2(1) — Forests Act 1958 (Vic), ss 4, 51, 52, 80(1), 82 — Victorian Plantations Corporation Act 1993 (Vic), ss 22, 27B

Practice and procedureNature of review and of appeal under ss 22 and 23 of the Valuation of Land Act 1960 (Vic) — Powers of Court on an appeal under s 23 in respect of a determination under s 21(4) — Valuation of Land Act 1960 (Vic), ss 21(3)(b) and (4), 22, 23, 24, 25(1)

Millsave Holdings Pty Ltd v Connective Group Pty Ltd75 VR 239

[2023] VSCA 326·McLeish, Macaulay, Lyons JJA·18 Dec 2023·Court of Appeal

CorporationsOppression of minority shareholder — Whether oppression established — Strategy to remove minority shareholder at below market price by applying financial pressure

CorporationsOppression of minority shareholder — Whether oppression established — Directors’ duties — Exercise of powers for improper purpose — Corporate restructure implemented to circumvent minority shareholder’s pre-emptive rights — Corporate restructure and sale of shares deliberately concealed from minority — Majority undertook sale of business and sought court approval for sale — Whether sale done to deprive minority shareholder of relief sought in oppression and derivative proceedings

CorporationsOppression of minority shareholder — Relief — Principles governing relief — Whether trial judge erred in ordering minority buy-out majority — Whether majority buy-out more appropriate

EvidenceAdmissibility — Admissions — Whether claiming confidentiality over a statement was implied admission as to truth of statement — Representation by conduct — Implied representation by silence — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 81

Djordjevich v Peter Djeka Pty Ltd75 VR 446

[2024] VSCA 60·McLeish, Walker and Macaulay JJA·11 Apr 2024·Court of Appeal

Administrative lawTribunals — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Powers — Functions of Principal Registrar of Tribunal — Co-owned property dispute — Tribunal made orders for sale of co-owned property — Orders empowering Principal Registrar to appoint real estate agent or solicitor if parties could not agree — Orders empowering Principal Registrar to execute any necessary document in the sale where party refused — Whether Tribunal had power to make orders — Whether Principal Registrar permitted to exercise functions conferred by such orders — Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), ss 228, 232 — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), s 32

Director of Public Prosecutions v HR75 VR 481

[2024] VSC 467·Elliott J·12 Aug 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria

Courts and judgesOpen courts — Criminal law — Application for proceeding suppression order — Whether an alleged child victim of offence who made no complaint and would not be called as a witness at trial was a ‘complainant’ or ‘witness’ — Open Courts Act 2013 (Vic), ss 1, 3, 17, 18(1)(d), 18(1)(e)

Words and phrases‘complainant’ — ‘witness’

An v Australian Broadcasting Corporation75 VR 493

[2024] VSC 518·Harris J·30 Aug 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria

Constitutional lawCommonwealth — Judicial power — Jurisdiction — Whether Australian Broadcasting Corporation is ‘the Commonwealth, or a person ... being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth’ — Whether proceeding in Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal a matter within federal jurisdiction — Whether VCAT has jurisdiction — Constitution, s 75(iii)

Constitutional lawCommonwealth — Judicial power — Jurisdiction — Whether proceeding requiring determination of whether a person is the Commonwealth is a matter ‘arising under [the] Constitution, or involving its interpretation’ — Whether proceeding a matter within federal jurisdiction — Whether VCAT has jurisdiction — Constitution, s 76(i)

Practice and procedureVictorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Whether VCAT has power and duty to determine own jurisdiction — Whether open and appropriate for VCAT to refer question of jurisdiction to Supreme Court — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), s 96

Practice and procedureCosts — Appeal costs — Whether referral of questions of law under s 96 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic) a case stated or special case — Appeal Costs Act 1998 (Vic), s 19

Victorian Building Authority v May21 Pty Ltd75 VR 536

[2024] VSCA 150·Emerton ACJ, Niall and Osborn JJA·28 June 2024·Court of Appeal

Building contractsStaged building permit — Building permit levy — Estimate of cost of building work for purpose of levy — Matters to which building surveyor may have regard — Whether building surveyor required to estimate cost of building work by reference to specified contract price only — Building Act 1993 (Vic), ss 205G, 205H(1), 205H(1A), 205HA, 205I(2)(a)(i), 205L

Words and phrases‘having regard to’

Re CD75 VR 559

[2024] VSC 456·Richards J·2 Aug 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria

Courts and judgesParens patriae or welfare jurisdiction — Child wishing to commence medical treatment for gender dysphoria — Family law — Parental consent — Only one parent available to consent, and consenting, to treatment — Whether sufficient consent — Whether court approval of treatment required — Whether declaration should be made — Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss 61B, 61C — Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic), ss 50, 55, 58

Kostiuk v KH (a pseudonym) (No 2)75 VR 572

[2024] VSC 636·Ginnane J·18 Oct 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria

CostsAppeal costs — Indemnity certificate — Orders of Magistrates’ Court of Victoria striking out application under Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic) — Orders set aside and rehearing ordered — Application for indemnity certificate in respect of costs of appeal — Whether application under Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic) a ‘civil proceeding’ — Appeal Costs Act 1998 (Vic), s 4(1) — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 3 — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), s 3 — Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic), ss 3, 6, 11

Fei v Hexin75 VR 581

[2024] VSCA 158·Kennedy, Macaulay and Lyons JJA·4 July 2024·Court of Appeal

Practice and procedureDiscovery — Preliminary discovery — Requirement that there be reasonable cause to believe applicant for preliminary discovery has or may have right to obtain relief — Whether necessary for applicant to identify cause of action said to give rise to right to relief — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 32.05

Oliver Hume Property Funds v CSR75 VR 593

[2024] VSCA 175·Kennedy, Macaulay and Lyons JJA·8 Aug 2024·Court of Appeal

Stamp dutyTransactions treated as transfer — Relevant acquisition of significant interest in landholder — Liability for duty upon acquisition of interest in landholder — Shares in landholder issued to 18 investors — No single investor acquired an interest in landholder that was of itself significant — Whether investors acquired interests via associated transactions that together amounted to significant interest — Whether landholder assessable for duty — Duties Act 2000 (Vic), ss 3(1), 77, 78

Words and phrases‘relevant acquisition’ — ‘associated transaction’