Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

69 VR(12 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

WEQ v Medical Board of Australia69 VR 1

[2021] VSCA 343·Kyrou and McLeish JJA·8 Dec 2021·Court of Appeal

Practice and procedureProceeding suppression order — Necessity test — Proceeding suppression order made in disciplinary proceedings in Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Disciplinary proceedings arose from notification made to regulator by Family Court of Australia — Materials in Family Court proceeding released to regulator on condition that confidentiality orders sought — Whether order in the interests of justice — Whether order necessary to prevent substantial risk of prejudice to proper administration of justice — Whether scope of order confined to what necessary to achieve purpose — Open Courts Act 2013 (Vic), ss 12, 14, 16, 17, 18 — Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 121

Words and phrases‘interests of justice’

Bolitho v Banksia Securities Limited (No 18)69 VR 28

[2021] VSC 666·John Dixon J·11 Oct 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Legal practitionersOverarching obligations — Paramount duty to court — Fraudulent scheme to obtain grossly inflated legal costs and litigation funding commission from settlement of group proceeding — Repeated contraventions of duty and obligations — Where conduct corrupted the proper administration of justice — Where solicitor on record played only a post-box role — Where targeted destruction of documents discovered — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), ss 10, 16–19, 21, 24

Practice and procedureParamount duty to court — Whether breach of fiduciary duty to client is a breach of paramount duty to court — Whether solicitor and counsel for lead plaintiff in group proceedings have fiduciary duty to unrepresented group members when negotiating, documenting and seeking court approval of a settlement — Where solicitor on record played only a post-box role — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 16

Practice and procedureExpert witness — Evidence — Paramount duty to court and overarching obligations of expert witness — Costs lawyer engaged to opine on reasonableness of legal costs — Expert falsely represented compliance with Expert Code of Conduct — Expert not independent and acted as advocate — Failure by expert to make appropriate enquiries, apply specialised knowledge and disclose all facts, matters and assumptions relied on in preparing report — Where contraventions materially contributed to deception of court by other contraveners — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), ss 10, 16, 21

Legal practitionersBarristers — Removal from Supreme Court roll on court’s own motion — Where counsel party to fraudulent scheme — Deliberate breach of paramount duty and overarching obligations under Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) — Whether fit and proper persons to remain on the Supreme Court roll – Where defendants concede removal appropriate — Legal Profession Uniform Law (Vic), s 23

Practice and procedureDeath of party — Where contravener of overarching obligations died after joinder to proceeding — Whether jurisdiction to order compensation abated upon defendant’s death — Whether contravention of overarching obligations constitutes a cause of action — Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 29

Practice and procedureDiscovery — Obligations of parties and practitioners to the proper administration of justice — Where targeted destruction of documents discovered — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 16

Practice and procedureContraventions of overarching obligations — Compensation — Whether appropriate in the interests of justice to award compensation to group members who suffered loss caused by contraventions — Whether contravening conduct materially contributed to loss — Whether legal costs or other costs or expenses of any person arising from the contravention — Quantification of compensation — Penalty interest — Whether judgment for compensation ought to be limited to the proportionate responsibility of each individual contravener — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 29 — Penalty Interest Rates Act 1983 (Vic) — Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), pt 4AA

Vallianos v Coroners Court of Victoria69 VR 276

[2023] VSC 48·Forbes J·14 Feb 2023·Supreme Court of Victoria

Administrative lawJudicial review — Coroner — Where deceased died without a valid will — Test to be applied by Coroner to decide whether a person has a claim for release of the deceased’s body as executor — Whether Coroner has discretion in determining who has better claim to release of the body — Coroners Act 2008 (Vic), ss 3, 48 — Wills Act 1997 (Vic), ss 7, 9

Charter of Human Rights and ResponsibilitiesEquality before the law — Privacy — Freedom of association — Inconsistency of law with human rights — Claim for custody of body of deceased person — Whether s 48 of the Coroners Act 2008 (Vic) and definition of ‘senior next of kin’ inconsistent with human rights protected under the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), ss 7, 8, 13, 16

GP Building Holdings Pty Ltd v Voitin69 VR 299

[2022] VSCA 210·Niall, Sifris and Walker JJA·30 Sept 2022·Court of Appeal

EquityFiduciary obligation — Breach — Accessory liability — Knowing receipt — Solicitor misappropriated client monies from trust account — Whether solicitor’s spouse knowingly received misappropriated trust property — Whether spouse had constructive knowledge or ‘ought to have known’ the source of receipts — Standard of proof of knowledge for liability in knowing receipt — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 140

Adaz Nominees Pty Ltd v Castleway Pty Ltd69 VR 329

[2022] VSC 600·Niall JA·6 Oct 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Courts and judgesDisqualification — Bias — Reasonable apprehension of bias — Trial judge personal friend of chief executive officer of law firm acting for one party — Chief executive officer not involved in conduct of the matter — Whether association with chief executive officer gives rise to reasonable apprehension of bias

Zphere Pty Ltd v Pakis69 VR 338

[2022] VSC 496·M Osborne J·26 Aug 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Partnership and partnersFiduciary obligations of partners — Successful claim by partnership of breach of duty against partner — Settlement of proceeding — Whether retired partner not party to settled proceeding estopped from pursuing like claims against defaulting partner — Res judicata — Partnership Act 1958 (Vic), ss 8, 32, 33

Partnership and partnersContract — Deed of settlement — Settlement of claim by partnership — Whether settlement binding on retired partner not party to deed — Authority to bind partnership — Scope of settlement — Whether manager of partnership entered into deed of settlement on behalf of all partners with an entitlement — Whether manager authorised to enter into deed — Whether intention to enter into deed as agent for principal

Practice and procedureAbuse of process — Whether proceeding should be stayed — Whether second action unduly or oppressively burdensome to defendant — Whether defendant faces double jeopardy

Bird v DP (a pseudonym)69 VR 408

[2023] VSCA 66·Beach, Niall and Kaye JJA·3 Apr 2023·Court of Appeal

TortVicarious liability — Assistant priest appointed to Diocese — Assistant priest not an employee or independent contractor of Diocese — Sexual abuse by assistant priest of child in home of parishioners — Whether Diocese vicariously liable for sexual abuse — Whether sexual abuse sufficiently connected with the role and functions of assistant priest so as to be the occasion for the abuse

James v English69 VR 451

[2023] VSCA 46·Priest, T Forrest JJA·6 Mar 2023·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Jurisdiction — Summary offences — Competency of application for leave to appeal — Whether appeal lies to Court of Appeal from County Court exercising appellate jurisdiction from Magistrates’ Court conviction for summary offence — Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), s 10(1)(c) — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), ss 254, 272 — County Court Act 1958 (Vic), s 74

Seccull v The King69 VR 454

[2022] VSCA 219·Priest AP, Niall JA and Kidd AJA·14 Oct 2022·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Sexual offences — Jury directions — Evidence of complainant’s distress — Whether direction that jury entitled to use evidence of complainant’s distress as indirect evidence supporting prosecution case — Whether jury directions impermissibly invited tendency reasoning — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 56, 137

Fox v Westpac69 VR 487

[2021] VSC 573·Nichols J·14 Sept 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

CostsGroup proceedings — Group costs order application — Principles governing making of order — Exercise of statutory discretion — Orders appropriate or necessary to ensure justice is done in the proceeding — Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), s 33ZDA

Words and phrases‘appropriate or necessary’

National Australia Bank v Redside Pty Ltd69 VR 539

[2023] VSC 145·M Osborne J·29 Mar 2023·Supreme Court of Victoria

CompaniesReceivers and managers — Appointment out of court — Validity of appointment — Doubt — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 418A

Bankruptcy and insolvencyReceivers and managers — Appointment out of court — Validity of appointment — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 418A

PropertyValidity of charge entered into in breach of statutory provision — Where lessee of Crown land granted a charge without obtaining the consent of the Minister — Whether granting a charge over leased land involved encumbering the land — Whether charge invalid — Whether action taken pursuant to charge invalid — Land Act 1958 (Vic), s 137AD

Words and phrases‘doubt’

Obian v The King69 VR 553

[2023] VSCA 18·Priest, Niall & Macaulay JJA·16 Feb 2023·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Sentence — Procedure — Application at trial by the Crown to re-open case after accused gave evidence — Rebuttal evidence — Whether evidence could have reasonably been foreseen — Characterisation of evidence — Material to which reference may be had in determining foreseeability — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), s 233(2)

Words and phrases‘could not reasonably have been foreseen’