Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

68 VR(21 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Asmar v Albanese [CA]68 VR 1

[2022] VSCA 19·T Forrest, Whelan JJA, Forbes AJA·25 Feb 2022·Court of Appeal

Unincorporated associationsPolitical party — Governance — National executive taking over administration of state branch — National executive proposing to conduct pre-selection for candidates for federal election — Justiciability — Whether jurisdiction to hear allegations of breach of constitution of association — Whether jurisdiction arises from statutory recognition of political parties — Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth), ss 166, 169B

Re Curtis68 VR 40

[2022] VSC 621·McMillan J·17 Oct 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Administration and probateWill — Remote execution procedure — Testator made will with witnesses attending remotely via audio-visual link — Requirements for satisfying remote execution procedure — Whether witnesses clearly saw testator’s signature being made — Whether testator clearly saw witnesses’ signatures being made — Wills Act 1997 (Vic), ss 3(1), 8A, 8D, 9

Baker v The King68 VR 76

[2022] VSCA 196·Emerton ACJ, Priest and Niall JJA·14 Sept 2022·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Second or subsequent appeal — Murder — Deceased forced out of a window during a fight — Co-accused acquitted by jury — Out of court statement by co-accused not admissible at trial — Legislative change after trial made co-accused’s out of court statement admissible — Whether evidence fresh — Whether evidence compelling — Criminal Procedure Act 1958 (Vic), ss 318, 326A, 326B, 326C, 326D, 326E — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 83(2)

Re St George Development Company68 VR 110

[2022] VSC 295·Nichols J·6 June 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

ContractJoint venture — Unit trust — Payments by joint venturer unit holders to trustee — Characterisation — Whether payments made as loans or capital

Trusts and trusteesApplication by liquidator for directions — Concurrent inter partes preliminary question — Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) (sch 2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)), s 90-15 — Trustee Act 1958 (Vic), s 63

David Barry Logistic v Victoria (No 3)68 VR 157

[2022] VSC 575·M Osborne J·30 Sept 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureJudgments and orders — Final orders made — Proceeding dismissed — Stay of one order granted — Reservation of liberty to apply — Plaintiff sought leave to amend originating motion under liberty to apply — Whether court had power to grant leave — Whether Court functus officio — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 47 — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 36.01

GLP Batesford Holdings Pty Ltd v 68 Bridge Road Land Pty Ltd68 VR 171

[2022] VSC 614·Riordan J·5 Oct 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Sale of landDeposit — Release — Whether special condition for release void — Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic), ss 27(3), 27(6)

Visser v The King68 VR 188

[2023] VSCA 10·Emerton P, Priest, McLeish, T Forrest and Kennedy JJA·9 Feb 2023·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Sentence — Second application — First application for leave to appeal against sentence refused by Court of Appeal — Application for extension of time to file second application for leave to appeal against sentence — Whether Court of Appeal has power to entertain further application for leave to appeal against sentence — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), ss 3(1), 278, 279, 280, 281, 315

Re Dawning68 VR 226

[2022] VSC 641·Hetyey AsJ·28 Oct 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

CompaniesWinding up — Just and equitable ground — Oppression — Deadlock — Two companies and a unit trust established to conduct a property investment and development business — Breakdown of trust and confidence — Intractable deadlock preventing companies from operating effectively — Whether conduct oppressive — Whether winding up on just and equitable ground justified — Whether ‘some other remedy’ available — Concurrent action by lender associated with plaintiff to recover debts owed by companies — Whether winding up application brought as an abuse of process — Whether plaintiff had unclean hands — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 232, 233(1)(h), 461(1)(f), 461(1)(k), 467(4)

CompaniesWinding up — Trustee — One company in which oppression occurred was trustee of unit trust — Power to order winding up of trust — Whether orders should be made for appointment of receiver and manager of assets of unit trust — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 53, 232, 233(1)(h), 461(1)(f), 461(1)(k), 467(4)

Thomas v The A2 Milk Company Ltd68 VR 283

[2022] VSC 725·Button J·28 Nov 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Conflict of lawsJurisdiction — Personal jurisdiction — Subject matter jurisdiction — Claim of breach of foreign statute — Whether Victorian Supreme Court may make declaration and grant remedies in respect of alleged breach of foreign law

Conflict of lawsForeign law — Proof — Whether parties may agree content of foreign law

Words and phrases‘jurisdiction’

Barodawala v Perinparajah68 VR 329

[2022] VSCA 198·Kyrou, Sifris and Walker JJA·16 Sept 2022·Court of Appeal

Bankruptcy and insolvencyBankruptcy — Discharge — Judgment debt — Judgment on claim for involvement in misleading and deceptive conduct — Reasons for judgment contained findings as to conduct of debtor — Whether judgment debt a ‘debt incurred by means of fraud’ — Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 153(2)(b)

GHM Nominees v Wallace Jackson68 VR 377

[2022] VSCA 230·Ferguson CJ, Sifris and Macaulay JJA·26 Oct 2022·Court of Appeal

ContractTerms — Inferred and implied — Loan — Advance to corporate trustee by unitholder for the purchase of investment property — Property only asset of trust — No express term for repayment — When loan repayable

Maher v Burden68 VR 402

[2022] VSC 617·Moore J·19 Oct 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Bankruptcy and insolvencyClaim for further provision from deceased estate — Plaintiff declared bankrupt — Whether proceeding stayed automatically — Whether plaintiff’s claim a cause of action in respect of ‘any personal injury or wrong’ — Whether trustee elected to discontinue proceeding — Whether plaintiff entitled to continue proceeding upon discharge — Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), pt IV — Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 60(2), 60(3), 60(4)

Administration and probateClaim for further provision from deceased estate — Plaintiff declared bankrupt — Whether proceeding stayed automatically — Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), pt IV — Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 60(2), 60(3), 60(4)

Foursquare Construction Management Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority68 VR 415

[2022] VSCA 237·McLeish and T Forrest JJA and J Forrest AJA·28 Oct 2022·Court of Appeal

Accident compensationTruck driver sustained injury after alighting from truck — Intention to inspect drop off point for delivery — Truck stationary — Whether incident a transport accident — Whether injury ‘directly caused by’ the driving of a motor vehicle — Transport Accident Act 1986 (Vic), s 3

Words and phrases‘transport accident’ — ‘directly caused by’

Cotterill v Romanes and Sutton68 VR 433

[2021] VSC 498·Niall JA·17 Aug 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Constitutional lawCommonwealth — Implied freedom of political communication — Directions given by State officials under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic) to address a serious risk to public health arising from COVID-19 pandemic — Directions restricting movement of people and public gatherings — Whether directions infringed implied freedom of political communication — Whether plaintiff had standing to seek relief — Whether constitutional test to be applied at the level of the authorizing statute or of directions made under it — Whether relevant statutory provisions infringed the implied freedom of political communication — Whether utility in granting relief — Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic), ss 200(1)(b) and (d)

Jolin Nominees v Daniel Investments (Aust) Pty Ltd68 VR 504

[2022] VSCA 209·Niall, Sifris and Walker JJA·30 Sept 2022·Court of Appeal

Building contractsDomestic building contract — Variation to contract — Extension of time for completion — Statutory notice provisions for variation not complied with — Whether cost of variation recoverable — Satisfaction of Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Whether ‘significant or exceptional hardship’ included consequences of builder’s inability to recover money — Whether contract ‘varied in accordance with’ section — Adjustment of completion date — Failure to satisfy contractual extension provisions — Whether contractual notice a prerequisite for Tribunal’s power to extend contract — Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), ss 37, 38(6)(b), 39(c)

Word and phrases‘significant or exceptional hardship’ — ‘in accordance with’

Re Sambucco68 VR 529

[2022] VSC 699·Moore J·21 Nov 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Wills and estatesMarriage — Revocation of will by marriage — Where deceased participated in religious wedding ceremony without proper notice of intention to marry — Whether religious wedding ceremony sufficient to revoke earlier will — Whether marriage void due to absence of real consent — Marriage Act 1961 (Cth), ss 23B, 41, 42, 45, 48 — Wills Act 1997 (Vic), s 13(1)

Pugwall v Arthur McKenzie Investments PL68 VR 559

[2022] VSCA 272·Kyrou, Sifris and Kennedy JJA·9 Dec 2022·Court of Appeal

ContractGuarantee — Joint venture agreement between corporations — Agreement containing director’s guarantee — Execution of agreement only by company by director on behalf of company — Whether intention to be bound — Whether director personally liable under guarantee

GuaranteeAgreement containing guarantee — Execution — Agreement signed by director on behalf of company — No separate execution by guarantor — Whether agreement ‘signed by the party to be charged’ — Instruments Act 1958 (Vic), s 126

Re Ramsay Health Care68 VR 576

[2022] VSC 226·Forbes J·10 May 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Contempt of courtCivil contempt — Purging of contempt — Subpoenaed documents — Use of documents for unrelated disciplinary proceedings — Breach of implied undertaking of confidentiality attaching to documents produced under compulsion — Whether breach conscious — Standard of knowledge necessary to establish contempt — Application to discharge contempt

Re Buildark Constructions68 VR 595

[2022] VSC 653·Gardiner As J·28 Oct 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

CompaniesWinding up in insolvency — Proof of debt — Admission or rejection — Liquidator declined to adjudicate on creditor’s proof of debt due to lack of funds — Creditor applied to Court for decision — Whether claims admitted to proof in the winding up — Whether claim for untaxed bill of costs provable — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 553(1), 533(1A) — Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth), reg 5.6.53

Central Murray Credit Union Ltd v Estate of Cochrane68 VR 612

[2022] VSC 647·Hetyey AsJ·14 Oct 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

PropertyMortgage — Default — Mortgagee’s action for recovery of possession — Mortgagor deceased but no representation of estate — Form of judgment — Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), ss 29, 40(1)

Practice and procedureJudgment for possession of property following default — Form of judgment in absence of personal representative of mortgagor — Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), ss 29, 40(1) — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), rr 9.08(1), 16.03(1)(a)

Gonzalez v The Queen68 VR 620

[2022] VSCA 110·Maxwell P, Emerton and Sifris JJA·10 June 2022·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawEvidence — Admissibility — Terms of compromise — Admissions contained in settlement deed prepared in connection with unrelated civil proceedings — Tender of deed at criminal trial — Whether settlement deed wrongly admitted — ‘Without prejudice’ privilege — Scope of s 131 Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) — Whether s 131 extends common law ‘without prejudice’ privilege to cover finalised settlement agreements — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 131

EvidencePrivilege — Settlement negotiations — Whether Evidence Act extends common law ‘without prejudice’ privilege to cover finalised settlement agreements — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 131