Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

67 VR(18 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Cargill Aust Ltd v Viterra Malt Pty Ltd (No 30)67 VR 1

[2022] VSC 80·Elliott J·25 Feb 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureInterest — Statutory interest — Whether good cause shown to limit period of statutory interest — Delay in proceeding — Whether prescribed interest rate applies — Whether departure from prescribed interest rate justified — Whether to award commercial rate or risk-free rate — Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), s 60(1) — Penalty Interest Rates Act 1983 (Vic), s 2.

Badger v Bayside City Council67 VR 15

[2022] VSC 140·John Dixon J·23 Mar 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Planning and environmentPlanning scheme — Display of temporary election signs — Display on fence or in front garden of residence — Whether permit required — Whether display of yards sign a ‘development’ or ‘use’ — Whether cl 52.05 of the Planning Scheme regulated yard signs — Whether yard signs exempt from requiring a planning permit — Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic), s 3 — Bayside Planning Scheme, cls 52.05, 52.05-10, 62.01, 73.02

Statutory interpretationPlanning scheme — Whether securing temporary signs to fence by cable ties a ‘development’ or ‘use’ — Meaning of ‘event’ and applicable time limit for display of signs in cl 52.05-10 — Meaning of ‘development’ or ‘use’ — Proper construction of phrase ‘putting up for display’ — Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic), s 3 — Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic), s 23 — Bayside Planning Scheme, cls 52.05, 52.05-10, 62.01, 73.02

Constitutional lawCommonwealth — Implied freedom of political communication — Validity of delegated legislation — Whether Planning Scheme burdened the implied freedom of political communication — Bayside Planning Scheme, cls 52.05

Words and phrases‘development’ — ‘use’ — ‘promotion sign’ — ‘event’ — ‘putting up for display’

Maher v Krumins67 VR 40

[2022] VSC 281·Jane Dixon J·27 May 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Criminal lawAnimal cruelty — Sentencing — Whether Magistrate erred in making comparisons to different legislative scheme — Whether Magistrate reversed onus of proof — Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986 (Vic), ss 10, 12 — Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic), ss 2, 4, 21 — Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), ss 5, 6, 7

Piastrino v Seascape Constructions67 VR 70

[2022] VSC 202·Delany J·26 Apr 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Building contractsDomestic building contracts — Security of Payments — Adjudication determination — Mixed use development — Development for investment purposes — Whether falling within exemption for domestic building contracts — Whether contract a domestic building contract for the carrying out of domestic building work — Whether plaintiffs ‘in the business of building residences’ — Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic), s 7(2)(b) — Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), ss 5(1)(a), 5(1)(e), 6, 12

Words and phrases‘domestic building work’ — ‘in the business of building residences’

Break Fast Investments v Sclavenitis67 VR 132

[2022] VSC 288·Riordan J·6 June 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

InsolvencyWinding up — Liquidator — Powers of liquidator — Company formerly corporate trustee — Trustee removed from office automatically on winding-up — Whether former trustee empowered to sell trust asset — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 477

Trust and trusteesBare trust — Trustee removed from office on winding-up — Powers of bare trustee — Trustee’s assignment of debt — Whether breach of trust — Whether transfer in breach of trust void and nullity — Trustee’s right of indemnity and exoneration — Whether right of indemnity assignable — Enforcement of debt owing to trust — Assignee of trustee’s right of exoneration — Whether standing to bring enforcement proceeding

Djordjevich v Rohrt67 VR 161

[2022] VSCA 84·Kennedy and Whelan JJA·10 May 2022·Court of Appeal

CompaniesWinding up — Liquidators — Control of liquidators — Court’s statutory jurisdiction to inquire into conduct of liquidators — Application by shareholder for inquiry into conduct of liquidators — Principles for whether to inquire — Whether error to adopt ‘three-stage process’ from repealed provisions — Whether error to consider public interest factors — Whether error to consider whether application primarily directed towards vindication of private rights — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 536 (repealed), sch 2, cls 90-5, 90-10, 90-15, 90-20.

CostsApplication for leave to appeal costs order — Whether reviewable error in costs decision

Asmar v Albanese and Others67 VR 202

[2021] VSC 672·Ginnane J·19 Oct 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Unincorporated associationsPolitical party — Governance — National executive taking over administration of state branch — National executive proposing to conduct pre-selection of candidates for federal election — Justiciability — Whether jurisdiction to hear allegations of breach of constitution of association — Whether jurisdiction arises from statutory recognition of political parties — Whether jurisdiction arises from plaintiff’s interest in property of association — Interaction of rules of branch and national constitution — Constitution (Cth), s 15 — Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth), ss 126, 130, 286A, 296 — Constitution Act 1975 (Vic), s 27A — Electoral Act 2002 (Vic), ss 43, 44, 45, 50, 211, 212

Trusts and trusteesProperty of unincorporated association held on trust — Standing of members of association to bring proceedings alleging breach of trust — Whether interference in affairs of trust

Practice and procedureRepresentative order — Whether need for a common grievance — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), rr 18.2, 18.4

Thompson v Minogue67 VR 301

[2021] VSCA 358·Kyrou, McLeish and Niall JJA·17 Dec 2021·Court of Appeal

Human rightsCharter of Human Rights and Responsibilities — Privacy — Inherent dignity of human person — Prisoners — Random urine tests and strip searches — Whether proper consideration given to respondent ‘s rights — Whether arbitrary interference with privacy — Whether dignity right limited — Whether limitations to rights demonstrably justified — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), ss 7(2), 13(a), 22(1), 38(1)

Administrative lawJudicial review — Whether strip searches authorised by regulations — Onus of proof — Corrections Regulations 2019 (Vic), reg 87(1)(d)

Transport Accident Commission v Burns67 VR 403

[2022] VSC 294·Richards J·3 June 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Accident compensationTransport accident — Claim for compensation — Time limit for claim — Respondent’s partner died as a result of a transport accident — Respondent made claim for funeral and dependency benefits — Respondent later sought to claim impairment benefit — Commission declined to determine respondent’s degree of impairment — Whether Transport Accident Act distinguishes between claims for compensation by persons injured as a result of transport accidents, and claims by dependants of persons who die as a result of transport accidents — Whether time limit in s 68 applies separately to each category of claim — Transport Accident Act 1986 (Vic), ss 35, 46A, 47, 68

JL (a pseudonym) v Mental Health Tribunal67 VR 426

[2021] VSC 868·Ginnane J·23 Dec 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Judicial reviewMental Health Tribunal — Jurisdiction — Delegate of authorised psychiatrist making Temporary Treatment Order — Whether mandatory requirements complied with — Effect of error or non-compliance in making order — Jurisdiction of Mental Health Tribunal to make Treatment Order on own motion — Mental Health Act 2014 (Vic), ss 5, 10, 11, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 53, 54, 55, 153, 361

Human RightsCharter of Human Rights and Responsibilities — Right to freedom from medical treatment — Right to liberty — Temporary Treatment Order invalidly made — Whether incompatible with human rights — Whether authorised psychiatrist a ‘public authority’ — Whether Mental Health Tribunal a ‘public authority’ — Whether Tribunal gave proper consideration to relevant human rights — Validity of limits on human rights — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), ss 4(1), 7(2), 10(c), 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 32, 38

Practice and procedureRole of amicus curiae

Words and phrases‘public authority’ — ‘subject to’

Eastern Health v Neill (No 2)67 VR 458

[2022] VSC 315·Gorton J·10 June 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureCosts — Certification of counsel’s fees — Whether certification of counsel’s fees appropriate in application for judicial review of medical panel determination — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 (Vic), r 63.07(2)(c)

Zhang v Shi (No 6)67 VR 469

[2022] VSC 271·Delany J·26 May 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Contempt of courtSentence — Contemnor subject of freezing order — Six charges of contempt of court by breach of the freezing order proven — Whether contempts contumacious or deliberate — Appropriate punishment — Whether the court had power to suspend punishment on terms, including the performance of community service — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 75.11 — Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic)

R v ST67 VR 508

[2022] VSC 450·Taylor J·11 Aug 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Criminal LawEvidence — Admissibility — DNA results — Likelihood ratios — Forensic samples taken from knife found next to body of the deceased — Likelihood ratios calculated from Australian Caucasian Database and Australian Asian Database — Accused of Burmese descent — No assailants of Caucasian ethnicity — Whether to exclude Database likelihood ratio — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 55, 137

Criminal LawEvidence — Admissibility — Relevance — Context evidence — Evidence of an altercation on day prior to the fatal incident — No evidence accused involved in previous altercation — Evidence irrelevant — Evidence of gang violence likely to provoke emotional response in jury — Probative value outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 55, 137

Ajaimi v Giswick Pty Ltd (No 3)67 VR 529

[2022] VSC 447·M Osborne J·11 Aug 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Judgments, orders and declarationsInterest — Pre-judgment interest — Post-judgment interest — Appeal from Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Proceedings under Retail Leases Act 2003 — Order for compensation — No interest awarded by Tribunal — Tribunal order registered in Supreme Court — Entitlement to interest — Date from which interest payable — Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic), s 91(2) — Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), ss 58, 60, 101

Landlord and tenantRetail leases — Breach — Loss and damage — Interest — Power to award pre-judgment interest — Power to award post-judgment interest — Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic), s 91(2)

Practice and procedureSupreme Court — Enforcement of orders of Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Registration of Tribunal order in Supreme Court — Whether to amend order under slip rule — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), s 121, 148(7)(b) — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 36.07

RBK v Montague67 VR 545

[2022] VSCA 183·Beach, Niall and Macaulay JJA·31 Aug 2022·Court of Appeal

Accident compensationMotor vehicle — Injury arising from use of motor vehicle — Applicant left unconscious in parked motor vehicle — Applicant unconscious from drug overdose — Heatstroke and consequential injuries caused by prolonged heat exposure in parked vehicle — Whether injury arose out of the ‘use’ of a motor vehicle — Whether Transport Accident Commission liable to indemnify driver of motor vehicle in respect of applicant’s claim for damages — Transport Accident Act 1986 (Vic), ss 3(1), 3(3)(a), 94(1)(a)

Words and phrases‘caused by or arising out of’ — ‘use of motor vehicle’

Foris GFS Aust PL v Manivel67 VR 561

[2022] VSC 482·Elliott J·13 May 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureDefault judgment — Application for judgment in default of appearance — Relief sought beyond the statement of claim — Whether declaratory relief should be ordered — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), rr 21.01, 21.03, 21.04, 59.01

Practice and procedureService of process — Substituted service — Order directing service by sending an email ‘with’ documents — Whether email containing link to online shared drive sufficient to effect service — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 6.10

Tran v Hoang67 VR 583

[2022] VSCA 194·Kyrou, Sifris and Macaulay JJA·13 Sept 2022·Court of Appeal

ContractConstruction — Agreement by deed that party ‘shall expressly and irrevocably gift’ a fixed sum — Whether failure to pay sum gave rise to an actionable debt — Whether agreement was an incomplete gift — Whether damages for breach of contract awardable in absence of evidence of loss

CostsTrustee basis — Respondent was executor of promisor’s deceased estate and succeeded at first instance — Whether award of costs on the trustee basis appropriate

Certain Underwriters v Dhillon Scaffolding PL67 VR 606

[2022] VSCA 92·Ferguson CJ, Beach and Macaulay JJA·18 May 2022·Court of Appeal

InsurancePublic liability policy — Construction — Personal injury on scaffold built by insured — Insured sued for damages for personal injury — Insurer refusing indemnity — Whether insured required to take all reasonable precautions to comply with statutory requirements and safety regulations — Whether insured discharged burden of establishing that it took reasonable precautions