Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

65 VR(15 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Willis v Crosland65 VR 1

[2021] VSCA 320·Sifris, Walker JJA and Macaulay AJA·23 Nov 2021·Court of Appeal

ContractSale of land — Termination by purchaser — Claim by purchaser for return of deposit paid — Express right to terminate by notice contingent on purchaser at time of notice being ‘not then in default’ — Purchaser sought to terminate soon before deadline for performance — Whether purchaser entitled to return of deposit — Whether termination valid and effective — Whether purchaser ‘in default’ — Whether purchaser repudiated contract — Whether repudiation a ‘default’ — Whether purchaser ‘ready, willing and able’ to perform contract — Whether being ‘ready, willing and able’ to perform bore upon ability to terminate pursuant to express provision in contract

Sale of landContract — Standard form — Termination — Whether termination valid and effective — Provision in contract allowing termination where purchaser obtained report designating current defect in structure on land as ‘major building defect’ — Report identified ‘major defects’ — Whether report provided proper basis for termination — Whether exact form of wording required in report — Whether existence of ‘major building defect’ ascertainable from substance of report

Rio Tinto Shared Services PL v English Datasystems LLC65 VR 25

[2021] VSC 660·Lyons J·13 Oct 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureOriginating process — Service out of jurisdiction — Service outside of Australia — Hague Convention on Service Abroad — Defendant in Convention country — Service not effected by transmission of judicial document through a Convention ‘Central Authority’ — Where service effected in accordance with the law of defendant’s seat — Whether service in a Convention country must be through a ‘Central Authority’ — Hague Convention on Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 7.09, ord 80

Stuart v Said65 VR 50

[2021] VSCA 226·Maxwell P and McLeish JA·5 Aug 2021·Court of Appeal

Practice and procedureSecurity for costs — Inherent jurisdiction — Plaintiff natural person — Plaintiff impecunious — Whether discretion to order security for costs from natural person requires ‘exceptional circumstances’ or ‘additional factor’

DPP v Currie; DPP v Daniels (a pseudonym)65 VR 61

[2021] VSCA 272·Beach, McLeish and Walker JJA·30 Sept 2021·Court of Appeal

Statutory interpretationCrown notice of appeal — Director of Public Prosecutions instructed associate to affix Director’s electronic signature to notice — Whether requirement that notice be ‘signed ... personally’ by Director satisfied — Whether Director’s decision to commence appeal justiciable — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), ss 287, 288 — Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Act 2000, s 9(1)

Words and phrases‘signed personally’

Fuller v Allianz; Wilkinson v Allianz65 VR 78

[2021] VSC 581·Nichols J·15 Sept 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureGroup proceedings — Overlapping group proceedings — Plaintiffs sought to consolidate overlapping proceedings with joint representation by two firms of solicitors — Whether orders appropriate — Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), ss 33ZDA, 33ZF

Re Smit65 VR 107

[2021] VSC 642·Hollingworth J·5 Oct 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Criminal lawBail — Where bail granted in Magistrates’ Court of Victoria on conduct conditions — Application to vary conditions — Whether conditions onerous or unreasonable — Bail Act 1977 (Vic), ss 5AAA, 30A — Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic), ss 198, 203

Stephens v Cameron65 VR 117

[2021] VSCA 208·Kyrou, McLeish and Niall JJA·30 July 2021·Court of Appeal

Building contractsMajor domestic building contracts — Contract for management of construction of two townhouses — Owners contracted with registered builder, who as agent engaged trade contractors for the owners — Whether contract a ‘domestic building contract’ for purposes of Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 — Whether implied criterion of ‘responsibility’ limiting application of Domestic Building Contracts Act to contracts with persons legally responsible for works — Interaction of Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 and Building Act 1993 — Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), ss 1, 3–5, 8, 29, 31, 132–3 — Building Act 1993 (Vic), ss24A, 25E, 135–6, 137B

Statutory interpretationWhether s 40(2) of Domestic Building Contracts Act created statutory entitlement to repayment of amounts retained by builder in excess of prescribed progress payment limits — Whether contravention of s 40(2) founds unjust enrichment claim and forecloses defences — Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), ss 3, 13, 40, 132–3

Practice and procedureInterest — Statutory interest — Whether ‘free-standing’ right to interest in action for moneys had and received — Whether statute a ‘written instrument’ by virtue of which amount liable to be paid — Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), ss 58, 60

Words and phrases‘contract price’ — ‘domestic building works’ — ‘domestic building contract’ — ‘major domestic building contract’ — ‘builder’ — ‘owner-builder’ — ‘written instrument’

Brighton Automotive v Honda65 VR 146

[2021] VSC 757·Button J·22 Nov 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureService of originating process outside Australia — Claim founded on a tort — Claim for relief for breach of contract — Claim arising under an Australian enactment — Claim for interim or ancillary relief — Whether foreign respondent a necessary and proper party to a proceeding properly served on a domestic respondent — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015, r 7.02(a), (b), (d)(ii), (h), (i) and (j)

Practice and procedureService of originating process outside Australia — Form 7AAA notice — Whether applicant permitted to rely on a ground for service out not included in Form 7AAA — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015, r 7.05

Practice and procedureDiscovery — Preliminary discovery — Jurisdiction to serve application for preliminary discovery outside Australia without leave — Comity of nations — Considerations relevant to exercise of jurisdiction — Distinction between service out of application for preliminary discovery and service of subpoena overseas

Practice and procedureDismissal or stay of proceedings — Discretion to stay proceeding served outside Australia — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015, r 7.04

I Minh Holdings v Chuang65 VR 184

[2021] VSC 760·Garde J·24 Nov 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureSecurity for costs — Relevant factors — Costs relating to third party claim — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335(1) — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 62.02

Razzy Aust v Commissioner of State Revenue65 VR 206

[2021] VSC 124·Delany J·17 Mar 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Stamp dutyLandholder provisions — Unit trusts — Group restructure — Superannuation funds — Joint holders of three trusts — Interests separated into two independent groups — Concurrent redemptions of units in one unit trust and subscription for units in second trust — Aggregation of interests — Whether redemption by one unit holder gave rise to a transfer to remaining unit holders — Whether hypothetical transfer of property — Whether transfer occurred ‘in connection with’ member ceasing membership of fund — Duties Act 2000 (Vic), ss 40, 89D(a)

Words and Phrases‘transfer’ — ‘in connection with’

David Barry Logistics v Victoria65 VR 233

[2021] VSC 828·M Osborne J·13 Dec 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria

Constitutional lawPrerogative — Bona vacantia — Property disclaimed by liquidator — Whether right to bona vacantia abrogated by statute — Whether right to bona vacantia vested in Crown in right of Victoria or of Commonwealth — Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic), ss 3, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 65, 73, 75 — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 568A, 568B, 568D, 568E, 568F, 601AD

CompaniesWinding up — Powers of liquidator — Disclaimer of onerous property — Personal property — Goods in possession of third party recipient — Recipient unlicensed and unwilling to store and dispose of goods — Whether State a person in or to whom it seems to the Court appropriate that property be vested or delivered — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 568F

Valuer-General v AWF65 VR 327

[2021] VSCA 274·McLeish and Emerton JJA and Delany AJA·1 Oct 2021·Court of Appeal

Landlord and tenantFixtures — Chattels — Whether assets comprising wind farm were fixtures for the purpose of calculating the capital improved value of land — Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), s 154A

Local GovernmentFire services levy — Valuation — Real property — Wind farm assets — Whether fixtures — Whether chattels — Principles applicable to classification of fixtures — Determination of capital improved value — Fire Services Property Levy Act 2012 (Vic), ss 3, 4, 16 — Valuation of Land Act 1960 (Vic), ss 2(1),2(3), 2(3A), 5A, 13DC(6), (7), (7A), (8) and (9)

Words and phrases‘capital improved value’

Lanigan v Circus Oz65 VR 371

[2022] VSC 35·McDonald J·9 Feb 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

Administrative lawTribunals — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Claims of sexual harassment and victimisation contrary to Equal Opportunity Act 2010 — Whether subject to Limitation of Actions Act 1958 — Whether the Tribunal a ‘court’ for purposes of Limitation of Actions Act 1958 — Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic), ss 92, 103, 104, 188 — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 3, 5

Limitation of actionsVictorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Claim for sexual harassment and victimisation contrary to Equal Opportunity Act 2010 — Events more than six years prior to filing of proceeding in Tribunal — Whether limitation period applicable — Whether the Tribunal a ‘court’ for purposes of Limitation of Actions Act 1958 — Whether claim for contravention of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 an action founded on tort — Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic), ss 92, 103, 104, 188 — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 3, 5

DPP v Bowen65 VR 385

[2021] VSCA 355·Maxwell P, Priest, McLeish, T Forrest and Walker JJA·17 Dec 2021·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawSentencing — Totality — Offences committed while on parole — Parole cancelled and respondent required to serve remainder of original sentence for prior offending — Whether totality principle required consideration of entire period of original sentence

Criminal lawSentencing — Crown appeal against sentence — Trafficking in commercial quantity of drug of dependence — Category 2 offence — Whether open to impose combination sentence of imprisonment and community correction order — Whether sentence manifestly inadequate — Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), s 5(2H)(e)

Pacreef Investments v GTW Investments65 VR 405

[2022] VSC 56·M Osborne J·17 Feb 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria

CompaniesShare capital — Preference shares — Redeemable preference shares — Subscription agreement under which seller received shares in purchaser redeemable by purchaser on notice from seller — Separate agreement requiring shareholder of purchaser to subscribe for capital in purchaser to fund redemption of shares — Failure to redeem shares — Whether liability to redeem at option of shareholder constituted preference as against ordinary shares — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 254A(3)

ContractConstruction — Agreement to raise capital to fund redemption of redeemable preference shares — Liability of party to perform obligation if principal defaults agreement — Nature of agreement — Whether guarantee — Whether principle of strictissimi juris applied — Whether conditions precedent to agreement enlivened

EstoppelConduct — Silence — Whether seller of shares estopped from enforcing obligations arising under agreement to raise capital to fund redemption of redeemable preference shares