Loielo v Giles63 VR 1
Administrative law — Judicial review — State of emergency — Public health — Directions by authorised officer — Stay at Home Directions — Challenge by affected resident and business owner — Standing — Whether power to impose curfew — Whether authorised officer acted at the direction or behest of the Premier — Whether curfew decision unreasonable, irrational or illogical — Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic), ss 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 111, 197, 198, 199, 200
Administrative law — Judicial review — State of emergency — Directions by authorised officer — Stay at Home Directions — Basis of decision — Protection of public health — Whether public health direction unreasonable, illogical and irrational — Whether erroneous finding of jurisdictional fact — Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic)
Evidence — Admissibility — Opinion rule — Exception — Specialised knowledge — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 79
Human rights — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities — Freedom of movement — Right to liberty — Duty to give proper consideration to human rights — Substantive and procedural limbs — Restrictions on movement in response to threat to public health — Curfew in relation to large population groups — Power to order curfew — Whether measures proportionate — Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic) , s 200 — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006, ss 7(2), 12, 21, 38, 39