Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

62 VR(17 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

DPP v Hou62 VR 1

[2020] VSCA 190·Maxwell P, T Forrest and Weinberg JJA·30 July 2020·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawEvidence — Admissions by accused — Caution — Respondents arrested by casino staff and interrogated by staff prior to arrival of police — Failure by casino staff to caution respondents — Admissions by respondents to casino employees and police — Admissions made to casino staff not sought to be led at trial — Judge excluded admissions made to police — Relevant casino staff employed by casino in capacity relating to ‘the security and surveillance of the casino’ — Whether casino staff ‘investigating officials’ for purpose of the Crimes Act 1958 and Evidence Act 2008 — Whether admissions to casino staff illegally or improperly obtained — Whether subsequent admissions to police tainted by casino staff’s conduct — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), ss 458, 464(2), 464A, 464C, 464D, 464F — Casino Control Act 1991 (Vic), ss 1, 37(1)(b), 81 — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 90, 135, 137

Words and phrases‘investigating official’

Trani v Trani (No 3)62 VR 33

[2020] VSC 332·Daly AsJ·15 June 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureSet-off — Judgment debts — Where separate judgment debts owing between parties from different proceedings between them — Where each party entitled to costs against the other party in different proceedings — Whether the Court had inherent jurisdiction to set off a judgment debt in one proceeding against judgment debt in other proceeding — Test to be applied

McKechnie v VCAT62 VR 54

[2020] VSC 454·Cavanough J·7 Aug 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria

Freedom of InformationApplication fee on Freedom of Information request not paid — Whether ‘hardship’ must be determined by the processing agency — Whether request invalid — Whether invalid request founds jurisdiction of Information Commissioner or Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), s 17

Practice and procedureProceeding dismissed by oral order, not authenticated — Reconsideration of reasons after finding relevant obiter dicta in uncited Court of Appeal decision while preparing written reasons — Whether obiter dicta should be followed — Whether order should be recalled

Mai v Commissioner AFP62 VR 118

[2020] VSCA 38·Tate, McLeish and Hargrave JJA·5 Mar 2020·Court of Appeal

Judgments, orders and declarationsConfiscation — Suspected proceeds of crime — Restraining order — Application to revoke restraint — Onus — Whether no grounds to make order at time of revocation application — Whether authorised officer held suspicion on reasonable grounds — Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 18, 19, 42, 329, 330, 338

Words and phrases‘suspicion’ — ‘reasonable grounds’

Anderson v Stonnington City Council62 VR 147

[2020] VSCA 229·Maxwell P, Tate and McLeish JJA·7 Sept 2020·Court of Appeal

Planning and environmentPlanning scheme — Heritage overlay — Building permit — Planning permit — Accrued rights — Building permits issued prior to introduction of heritage overlay planning control — Whether building permits created accrued right — Lawfulness of development works without planning permit — Whether development works a ‘use’ — Stonnington Planning Scheme, cl 61.05 (now cl 72.06) — Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic), s 28(2)(e) — Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic), s 6(3)(d)

Statutory interpretationAmendment of subordinate instrument to extend heritage overlay over property while development works in progress — Whether absence of prior planning control constituted an accrued right — Whether development works a ‘use’ — Stonnington Planning Scheme, cl 61.05 (now cl 72.06) — Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic), s 28(2)(e) — Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic), s 6(3)(d)

AppealCivil — Practice and procedure — Application for leave to appeal from a decision of judge of Trial Division to dismiss appeal on question of law — Application for leave to amend grounds to introduce an issue withdrawn before Tribunal

Words and Phrases‘development’, ‘right’, ‘use’, ‘work’, ‘works’

Chang v Neill62 VR 174

[2019] VSCA 151·Maxwell ACJ, Beach and Kyrou JJA·27 June 2019·Court of Appeal

Administrative LawJudicial review — Duty to inquire — Procedural fairness — Whether by not making inquiries medical panel failed to discharge statutory function or to accord procedural fairness — Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 (Vic), div 3 of pt 6

Administrative LawJudicial review — Factual error — When factual error constitutes jurisdictional error — Whether primary judge applied correct principles — Whether no evidence for medical panel’s conclusions — Whether Medical Panel made factual error

Duca v The Queen62 VR 214

[2020] VSCA 209·Maxwell P, Priest and T Forrest JJA·21 Aug 2020·Court of Appeal

Criminal LawCriminal procedure — Alternative charges — Murder — Statutory murder — Common law murder — Jury returned verdict of guilty of statutory murder after unable to reach verdict on common law murder — Whether charge of statutory murder an available alternative to charge of murder contrary to common law — Whether statutory murder a separate and distinct offence from common law murder — Appropriateness of practice of pleading both murder and statutory murder as separate charges on indictment — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), s 3A

RCTC v WCB62 VR 234

[2020] VSCA 328·Beach, Kaye and Osborn JJA·18 Dec 2020·Court of appeal

ContractDeed of settlement — Bar to further claims — Claim for damages for sexual abuse — Subsequent legislative amendment removing relevant barriers to actions — Commencement of further proceeding — Whether ‘just and reasonable’ to allow further proceeding — Relevant factors — Amount of settlement sum — Lapse of time in issuing proceeding — Setting aside a previously concluded settlement arrangement — Unfair prejudice to defendant — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 27QD, 27QE

Statutory interpretationDetermining purpose and effect of legislative amendments — Clear and unambiguous terms — Consideration of historical context of legislation — Consideration of extrinsic materials — Retroactive effect of legislation — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), div 2 of pt IIA — Limitation of Actions (Child Abuse) Act 2015 (Vic), s 4 — Legal Identity of Defendants (Organisational Child Abuse) Act 2018 (Vic), ss 5, 7 — Children Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (Vic), s 32

Words and phrases‘just and reasonable’

Avery v Manno62 VR 281

[2020] VSC 605·Derham AsJ·21 Sept 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria

Administration and probateAdministration of estate — Application for judicial advice by executor — Prospective proceedings — Joint tenancy — Severance — Unregistered transfers of land — Where executor intended to lead further evidence in support of application — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 54.02

Practice and procedureTrusts and trustees — Application for judicial advice — Disputed facts — Application for summary dismissal — Whether application for advice lacked real prospect of success — Whether application for advice an abuse of process — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), ss 7, 8, 62, 64 — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), rr 23.01, 54.02

Elliott v Lindholm62 VR 307

[2020] VSCA 260·McLeish, T Forrest and Weinberg JJA·2 Oct 2020·Court of Appeal

Courts and judgesJudge — Bias — Apprehended bias — Recusal application — Refusal to recuse — Statements by Court as to whether legal practitioner had breached overarching obligations — Joinder of legal practitioner as party to proceeding on Court’s own motion — Whether basis for joinder gave rise to apprehended bias — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 29(2)(b)

Legal practitionersDuty to Court — Obligation of candour — Privilege against self-incrimination — Relationship between principles — Where Court required legal practitioner to give ‘full and frank’ explanation of conduct in affidavit — Whether Court could compel legal practitioner to give evidence — Court’s supervisory jurisdiction — Whether within jurisdiction

CoINVEST Ltd v Citywide Service Solutions Pty Ltd62 VR 337

[2020] VSC 190·Niall JA·21 Apr 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria

Statutory interpretationWhether entity an ‘employer’ — Whether entity a ‘public statutory body constituted under the law’ of Victoria — Rules of Construction Industry Long Service Leave Fund — Practice and procedure — Whether appeal raised a question of law — Whether error of law material — Construction Industry Long Service Leave Act 1997 (Vic), s 10

Words and phrases‘employer’ — ‘public statutory body constituted under the law’

CSR Ltd v Amaca Pty Ltd62 VR 359

[2016] VSCA 320·Maxwell P, Beach and Kaye JJA·16 Dec 2016·Court of Appeal

TortContribution — Manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos thermal insulation — Findings of asbestos exposure and causation dependent on inferences drawn from facts of general application — Whether exposure and causation established

EvidenceExceptions to hearsay — First-hand hearsay — Whether statements made to doctors by unavailable witnesses admissible to prove asbestos exposure — Revival of memory — Reading aloud parts of document — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 32(3), 63(2), 136 and 192(2)

Limitation of ActionsTorts committed before and after 31 December 1971 — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), s 5(1)(d) — Wrongs Act 1972 (Vic), ss 3, 24(4)

EquityContribution — Partners — Coordinate liabilities — Whether equitable contribution subsumed by statutory provisions providing for contribution between tortfeasors — Whether equitable contribution only available in cases where no statutory right of contribution available — Defences — Whether defence of laches available to defeat action commenced within statutory time limit applied by analogy

Octavius Securities & Investments Pty Ltd v Zerbe62 VR 447

[2020] VSCA 279·Tate, Sifris, Osborn JJA·11 Nov 2020·Court of Appeal

Judgments, orders and declarationsEnforcement — Charging order — Respondent judgment debtor a beneficiary of discretionary trust of which company was trustee — Applicant sought charging order over shares in trustee company — Where shares had only nominal value — Whether shares had any value beyond their nominal value — Whether shares in trustee amenable to a charging order — County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018 (Vic), r 73.02

Harris v Victorian Electoral Commission62 VR 460

[2020] VSC 676·Richards J·14 Oct 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria

ElectionsVictoria — Political parties — Public funding — Political parties in coalition — Single group voting tickets for Coalition (Liberal and National parties) candidates in multi-member Legislative Council regions — Public funding entitlement under Electoral Act 2002 (Vic) paid to Liberal Party in respect of combined group voting tickets — Proposed payment by Liberal Party to National Party pursuant to coalition agreement — Whether payment ‘gift’ and ‘political donation’ under Electoral Act 2002 (Vic) pt 12 — Whether payment ‘consideration in money or money’s worth’ — Whether payment for inadequate consideration — Electoral Act 2002 (Vic), ss 69A, 69B, 151, 206(1), 207F, 211, 212

Words and Phrases‘gift’, ‘political donation’, ‘consideration’

Brown v The Queen62 VR 491

[2020] VSCA 212·Maxwell P, Niall, T Forrest, Emerton and Osborn JJA·25 Aug 2020·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawSentencing — Impairment of mental functioning — Severe personality disorder — Sentencing judge constrained by authority from applying Verdins principles — Whether personality disorders can engage Verdins principles — Expert evidence — Causal link with offending — Moral culpability reduced

Sentencing Hearings: Expert Reports on Mental Functioning of Offenders62 VR 514

Supreme Court of Victoria

Mandie v Memart Nominees62 VR 528

[2020] VSCA 281·Tate, Niall and Emerton JJA·13 Nov 2020·Court of Appeal

TrustsFamily discretionary trust — Beneficiaries and objects — Disclaimer of interests in trust deed — Disclaimer by special beneficiaries — Impact on rights and interests of disclaiming individuals’ children — Doctrine of acceleration — Whether impact of disclaimer by interest holder the same as death of interest holder for purposes of doctrine

TrustsFamily discretionary trust — Beneficiaries and objects — Trustee’s power of exclusion — Removal of certain family members as general beneficiaries under trust — Whether exercise of power invalid — Whether exclusion beyond power or for improper purpose

Practice and procedurePleadings — Amendment — Application for leave to amend during trial — Where issue sought to be pleaded would have been unavoidable at trial — Whether refusal of leave a miscarriage of discretion