Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

59 VR(22 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Jams 2 Pty Ltd v Stubbings59 VR 1

[2019] VSC 482·Robson J·22 July 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

EquityUnconscionable conduct — Remedies — Mortgage — Guarantee — Loan — Right of guarantor to set transactions aside — Restitutio in integrum — Orders necessary to achieve practical justice — Whether guarantor required to repay principal and interest — Whether debt should be secured

Johnston v Dimos Lawyers59 VR 16

[2019] VSC 462·Wood AsJ·19 July 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Legal practitionersCosts — Costs disclosure — Costs agreement void — Fair and reasonable costs — Basis for assessment in default — Hourly rates — Whether scale rates applicable — ‘Fixed costs legislative provisions’ — Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth), sch 3 — Legal Profession Uniform Law (Victoria), ss 6, 172(3), 174(1)(b), 174(6), 178

Nguyen v DPP59 VR 27

[2019] VSCA 20·Maxwell P, Tate and Niall JJA·13 Feb 2019·Court of Appeal

Practice and procedureConfiscation orders — Unexplained wealth — Restraining order made ex parte — Power to revisit ex parte restraining order — Whether inherent or implied power of court to set aside ex parte order — Whether power removed by statute — Content of statutory obligation to provide notice of ex parte restraining order — Confiscation Act 1997 (Vic), ss 40F, 40H, 40I, 40J, 40S, 40W, 40X, 40ZA

Constitutional law (Cth)Chapter III — Judicial power — Institutional integrity and impartiality of State courts — Confiscation orders — Unexplained wealth — Restraining order made ex parte — Whether statute invalid by not guaranteeing notice and right to rehearing of ex parte restraining order — Confiscation Act 1997 (Vic), ss 40F, 40H, 40I, 40J, 40S, 40W, 40X, 40ZA

Masters Home Improve Aust v Aventus Cranbourne59 VR 80

[2019] VSC 428·Croft J·8 Aug 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Landlord and tenantLease — Tenant’s request to sublet part of leased premises — Landlord’s consent withheld — Whether consent unreasonably withheld — Whether landlord entitled to withhold consent on basis of prejudice to landlord’s commercial proprietary interests

Taylor v The Queen59 VR 163

[2019] VSCA 162·Priest and Beach JJA·5 July 2019·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Obtaining financial advantage by deception — Applicant obtained registration from Victorian Institute of Teaching by falsely declaring no prior convictions — False declaration enabled applicant’s employment as teacher — Whether disclosure of prior convictions unfairly prejudicial — Whether obtaining registration as teacher obtaining a ‘financial advantage’ — Whether obtaining employment a ‘financial advantage’ — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), s 82

DPP v Peters (a pseudonym)59 VR 203

[2019] VSCA 193·Priest and Niall JJA and Croucher AJA·30 Aug 2019·Court of Appeal

EvidencePrivilege — Self-incrimination — Waiver — Where witness claiming privilege pleaded guilty to perjury in other proceedings — Whether traversal of plea founds objection to giving evidence on ground of self-incrimination — Whether statute abrogates common law — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 128

Cruse v Victoria59 VR 241

[2019] VSC 574·Richards J·27 Aug 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

TortAssault and battery — Police — Unlawful arrest — Whether force necessary and reasonable — Excessive force — Damages — Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 3(G)(b), s 3WA, s 459 — Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 100.1, s 101.6

Finance and Guarantee Company v Auswild59 VR 288

[2019] VSC 665·Riordan J·3 Oct 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Civil procedureExpert witness — Obligations of expert witnesses — Independence — Non-disclosure by expert of certain matters — Communications between expert and lawyers and potential witnesses — Impact on overarching obligations — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 29

EvidenceExpert evidence — Admissibility — Objection to expert report and joint expert report on grounds of lack of independence, misleading conduct and failure to disclose basis for expert’s opinion — Whether inadmissible — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 79, 135

Chen v Kornucopia Pty Ltd59 VR 305

[2019] VSC 756·Sifris J·19 Nov 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

CompaniesWinding up application — Statutory demand — Whether statutory demand validly served — Presumption of receipt of prepaid post — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 109X(1)(a) — Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 29(1) — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 160

CompaniesWinding up application — Originating process — Requirement to attach statutory demand to application — Requirement that supporting affidavit accompany application — Whether defects or irregularities — Whether Court had power to amend, provide dispensation, or make remedial orders — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 459Q, 467(1), 467A — Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 2013 (Vic), r 5.4

Bildom Pty Ltd v Clement59 VR 352

[2019] VSC 865·Efthim AsJ·6 Nov 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Banks and BankingCheques — Mandate — Forged cheques — Bookkeeper engaged by plaintiff misappropriated funds of plaintiff — Defendant bank admitted debiting accounts with no mandate — Pleading — Whether open to bank to plead that plaintiff represented that first defendant was agent and officer of the plaintiff

Trani v Trani59 VR 362

[2019] VSC 723·Forbes J·26 Nov 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

NegligenceDamages — Breach of duty of care — Assessment of damages — Proportionate liability — Transfer of land without knowledge or consent of all owners — Licensed conveyancer negligent but not fraudulent — Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), ss 24AF, 24AH, 24AI, 23AM

Consumer lawFalse or misleading representations regarding transfer of land — Whether necessary for a person to be misled or deceived — Whether representations made in connection with the supply of goods or services — Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), sch 2, ss 18, 29

Mayberry v Mornington Peninsula Shire Council59 VR 383

[2019] VSC 623·Richards J·16 Sept 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Highways, streets and roadsCarriageway easement — Public highway — Whether private carriageway easement a public highway at common law — Narrow track through easement already a public highway — Whether inference that land owner intended entire easement to be a public highway — Dedication and acceptance — Legal principles — Onus of proof — Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic), s 42

Local GovernmentRoads — Declaration by Council of carriageway easement as a ‘public highway’ — Whether private carriageway easement a ‘road’ for the purposes of s 204 of Local Government Act — Whether easement a ‘right of way’ within the statutory definition of ‘road’ — Whether ‘right of way’ limited to public right of way — Whether decision affected by jurisdictional error — Local Government Act 1989 (Vic) ss 3, 204(1)

Local GovernmentWhether power to declare road under Local Government Act limited by the Land Acquisition and Compensation Act 1996 (Vic) — Local Government Act 1989 (Vic), ss 3, 187, 204, 206, 207B, sch 5

McLean v Racing Victoria59 VR 422

[2019] VSC 690·Richards J·18 Oct 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

PoliceSearch warrants — Warrant under Crimes Act 1958 — Syringes seized by police from licensed racehorse trainer — Information derived from things seized disclosed by police to Racing Victoria — Whether police owed duty of confidentiality regarding things seized — Whether limitation on use by police of information derived from seized things — Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014 (Vic) — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), s 465

PoliceCommon law powers and duties — Confidential information obtained in criminal investigations

Human RightsPrivacy — Search warrant — Whether disclosure of information derived from seized thing lawful — Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014 (Vic), Information Privacy Principle 2.1(e) — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities (Vic), ss 13(a), 32

Words and Phrases‘Unlawful activity’, ‘dealt with according to law’

Kinchington Estate Pty Ltd v Wodonga City Council59 VR 443

[2019] VSC 745·Quigley J·18 Nov 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Administrative lawJudicial review — Decisions of municipal council – Nature of council’s decisions — Whether decisions made in exercise of statutory power — Whether council acting as a tribunal when decisions made — Meaning of tribunal — Administrative Law Act 1978 (Vic), ss 2, 8(1)

Town and country planningPlanning scheme — Agreement between responsible authority and land owner — Application to amend agreement — Refusal of application — Refusal to furnish reasons — Whether requirement to furnish reasons — Whether rules of natural justice apply — Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic), ss 173, 178, 178A

Brown v The Queen59 VR 462

[2019] VSCA 286·Maxwell P, Priest, Kaye, T Forrest and Emerton JJA·10 Dec 2019·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawSentencing — Standard sentence scheme — Obligation to have regard to ‘standard sentence’ for offence — ‘Standard sentence’ as sentence for offence in the middle of the range of seriousness, taking into account only objective factors — Assessment of objective seriousness of offending — Whether sentencing judge required to classify subject offence on scale of seriousness referable to hypothesised mid-range offence — Whether conventional mode of sentencing altered — Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), ss 5(2)(ab), 5(2)(c), 5A, 5B

Lighthouse Corporation Ltd v Timor Leste59 VR 492

[2019] VSC 278·Almond J·2 May 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Practice and procedureJurisdiction — Contract — Foreign State — Act of state — Whether doctrine of act of state applicable — Forum non conveniens — Whether Victoria clearly inappropriate forum for determination of claim — Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth), ss 9, 11

Orman v The Queen59 VR 511

[2019] VSCA 163·Maxwell P, Niall and Emerton JJA·26 July 2019·Court of Appeal

Criminal lawAppeal — Appellant convicted of murder — Petition of mercy — Referral to the Court of Appeal — Subversion of the right to a fair trial — Substantial miscarriage of justice — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), ss 276(1)(c), 277(1), 327(2)

Re Castlerea Carpenters Pty Ltd59 VR 515

[2019] VSC 303·Lansdowne AsJ·7 May 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Legal PractitionersDuty to Court — Ex parte application — Unopposed application — Duty of disclosure — Full and frank disclosure — Disclosure of all relevant matters — Application for modification of restrictive covenant — Previous refusal of application over same land not disclosed — Jurisdiction to inquire into whether legal practitioners fulfilled obligation of disclosure — Whether jurisdiction enlivened — Nature and extent — Whether duty breached — Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), ss 84(1), 84(3) — Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015, r 19 — Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, rr 24, 25, 27

Legal practitionersOverarching duty — Breach — Obligation not to engage in misleading or deceptive conduct or conduct likely to mislead or deceive — Application for modification of restrictive covenant — Previous refusal of application over same land not disclosed — Whether breach of duty — Final orders authenticated — Whether jurisdiction under Civil Procedure Act after final orders made — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), ss 21, 29, 30

Courts and JudgesJurisdiction — Entry and authentication of orders — Whether jurisdiction to reopen proceedings after entry of judgment in absence of fraud

Courts and JudgesDuty to court — Counsel and solicitor — Ex parte application — Overarching duty — Duty of good faith — Duty of disclosure — Jurisdiction to inquire into whether legal practitioners fulfilled obligation of disclosure on ex parte application and at unopposed hearing — Whether jurisdiction under Civil Procedure Act after final orders made — Jurisdiction under Common Law and Conduct Rules — Nature and extent of jurisdiction — Whether jurisdiction enlivened — Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), ss 84(1), 84(3) — Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015, rr 19.1, 19.2, 19.4 — Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, rr 24, 25, 27 — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), ss 29, 30

Property lawRestrictive covenant over land — Application for modification — Identification of persons having benefit of covenant — Material matters — Previous application regarding same land refused — Failure to disclose prior application and disposition to Court — Court notified of previous unsuccessful application by third parties after making final orders — Whether breach of legal practitioners’ duty to Court — Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), ss 84(1), 84(3) — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 52.09

Waterfront Place Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning59 VR 556

[2019] VSCA 156·Maxwell ACJ, T Forrest and Emerton JJA·28 June 2019·Court of Appeal

Statutory interpretationTime — Statutory time limits — Ministerial notice to be given ‘no later than 7 days before hearing’ — Where time limit expired on a Sunday — Where notice given on following Monday — Whether general rule applied to extend time from ‘public holiday’ to following non-’public holiday’ — Whether ‘contrary intention’ disclosed in the statute to exclude general rule — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), sch 1 cl 58 — Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic), ss 4(1), 44(3)

Muscat v Magistrates' Court of Victoria59 VR 570

[2018] VSC 650·Richards J·31 Oct 2018·Supreme Court of Victoria

Occupational Health and SafetyDuty of employer — Independent contractors — Whether duty of employer to ensure safety of ‘persons other than employees of the employer’ applied to employees of independent contractors of the employer — Overlap of offences — Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic), s 21, s 23(1)

AppealMagistrates’ Court — Charge dismissed — Whether dismissal of charge a ‘final order’ — Whether appropriateness of charge a ground for dismissal — Whether respondent deprived of a defence by prosecution choice of charge — Whether abuse of process — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), s 272

Re Martin (Deceased)59 VR 584

[2019] VSC 424·McMillan J·25 June 2019·Supreme Court of Victoria

Administration and probateInformal will — Deceased made both formal will and informal document purporting to express different testamentary intentions — Requirements for entering informal will into probate — Whether informal document intended by deceased to be her will — Whether common law requirements of testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval met — Wills Act 1997 (Vic), ss 9(1),12–15

Dedert Corporation v United Dalby Bio-Refinery Pty Ltd59 VR 607

[2017] VSCA 368·Whelan, Priest and Kaye JJA·12 Dec 2017·Court of Appeal

Guarantee and suretyBank guarantee — Engineering contract — Design, construct and install contract — Unconditional guarantee to secure contractor’s obligations — Call on guarantee for damages due to defective work — Whether money due and payable under the contract — Whether contract precluded recourse to guarantee