Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

45 VR(36 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Stark v R45 VR 1

[2013] VSCA 34·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Maxwell P and Redlich JA and T Forrest AJA·1 Mar 2013·

Criminal law - Evidence - Admissibility - Hearsay rule - Exceptions - Prior representations - Complaint - Sexual offences - Incest, sexual penetration of child under 16, threats to kill - Complainant under 18 - Evidence of one complaint relied on to prove asserted fact as well as to support credibility - Evidence of other complaints relied on only to support complainant's credibility - Whether admissibility governed by Evidence Act 2008 or Criminal Procedure Act 2009 - Latter provision extending scope of former - Latter provision applicable - No error in admitting evidence - "Sufficiently probative" - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 66 - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 377

Brown v Maurice Blackburn Cashman45 VR 22

[2013] VSCA 122·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Harper and Osborn JJA and Macaulay AJA·22 May 2013·

Torts - Negligence - Duty of care - Scope - Psychiatric injury - Reasonable foreseeability - Employer and employee - Duties fixed at commencement of contract of employment - Risk of injury to particular employee - Law firm - Partner in charge of family law department - Alleged bullying and harassment by colleague - Inherently stressful work - Head of department taking leave of absence - Disputes emerging concerning interim arrangements for conduct of client files - Continuing deterioration in working relationship following partner's return from leave - Vicarious liability - Role of firm's managing partner - Alleged repeated unreasonable behaviour - Employee not obviously or inherently vulnerable to psychiatric injury - Substantial periods of time between incidents allegedly giving rise to liability - Lack of indication of effect on employee's mental health - Reasonableness of response to risk of psychiatric injury - Trial judge finding that psychiatric injury not reasonably foreseeable - Weight of evidence - Cumulative effect of individual incidents insufficient to give rise to liability - Appellate restraint - No basis for setting aside findings of fact.

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v FM45 VR 64

[2013] VSCA 129·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Ashley, Weinberg and Coghlan JJA·29 May 2013·

Criminal law - Commonwealth offences - Sexual offences - Interlocutory appeal - Using carriage service to procure person under 16 years to engage in sexual activity - Using carriage service to "groom" person under 16 years - Elements of offences - Intent - Online conversations of a sexual nature between accused and police officer posing as 14 year old girl - Impossibility no defence - Offences not established where jury satisfied that accused purely fantasising when communicating with recipient or Crown could not exclude reasonable possibility that accused so fantasising - Unnecessary to prove fixed intent on part of sender to engage in sexual activity - Leave to appeal granted - Appeal dismissed - Criminal Code (Cth) ss 474.26 474.27 474.27A 474.28

Cedar Meats (Aust) Pty Ltd v Five Star Lamb Pty Ltd45 VR 79

[2014] VSCA 32·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Nettle and Beach JJA and McMillan AJA·7 Mar 2014·

Contract - Discharge - Abandonment - Accrued rights - Intention - Objective assessment.

Contract - Waiver, election and estoppel - Whether gratuitous forbearance to enforce accrued rights sufficient to constitute binding waiver or election.

Contract - Penalty - Relief against penalties - Provision for payment of fixed sum if agreed daily volumes not delivered - Whether provision for payment penal.

Rapson v R45 VR 103

[2014] VSCA 216·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Maxwell P, Nettle and Beach JJA·11 Sept 2014·

Criminal law - Sexual offences - Rape and indecent assault - Evidence - Admissibility - Tendency evidence - Eight complainants - Cross-admissibility - Similarity or commonality in sexual acts or surrounding circumstances - Sufficiency - Crown concession that evidence of two complainants not cross-admissible - Evidence of other complainants cross-admissible - Re-trial ordered - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 97 101.

Murphy v Victoria and Another45 VR 119

[2014] VSCA 238·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Nettle AP, Santamaria and Beach JJA·29 Sept 2014·

Practice and procedure - Trial of preliminary questions - Factual basis - Sufficiency of identification - Facts admitted on pleadings - Major factual controversy - Plaintiff denied discovery of relevant documents - Whether trial of separate questions should take place before discovery complete - Procedural fairness - Cost minimisation - Parties' overarching obligation - Civil Procedure Act 2012 (No 47)

Courts and judges - Trial - Preliminary questions - Decision set aside - Remittal - Apprehended bias - Order for re-trial before another judge.

Trade practices - Misleading or deceptive conduct - Carrying on a business - Public statutory authority - Tollway construction project - "Business" - "In trade or commerce" - Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) - Australian Consumer Law s 18

Trade practices - Injunctive relief - Necessary nexus, performance of evaluative judgment and approach to exercise of injunctive power - Australian Consumer Law s 232 - Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 80

Heath (A Pseudonym) v R45 VR 154

[2014] VSCA 319·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Redlich and Beach JJA·11 Dec 2014·

Criminal law - Serious sex offenders - Orders - Conditions - Breach - Failure to comply with case workers' directions not a breach - Conviction quashed - Aggregate sentence for breaches fixed - Resentencing on remaining breaches - Aggregate sentence of five months' imprisonment - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 277 - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) s 5(2BD) - Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (No 91) ss 20 160(1)

Courts and judges - Serious sex offenders - Orders - Prohibition against publication - Court's reasons for decision - Handing down of reasons to public - Not a prohibited publication - "Person" - Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (No 91) ss 182 183

Director of Public Prosecutions v Cartwright45 VR 168

[2015] VSCA 11·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Weinberg, Priest and Beach JJA·11 Feb 2015·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Crown Appeal - Competence - Error in sentence - Judge not making sex offender registration order - Registrable offences - Whether requirement of imposition of sentence - Aggravated burglary with intention to assault with intent to rape - Appeal dismissed - Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (No 56) ss 6 7 11 34 - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) ss 287 288 289

Atanackovic v R45 VR 179

[2015] VSCA 136·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Weinberg, Kyrou and Kaye JJA·5 June 2015·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Commonwealth offences - Drugs - Trafficking - Possession - Marketable quantity of unlawfully imported border-controlled drug - Total effective sentence of four years' imprisonment with non-parole period of two years and six months - Crown concession of vitiating error based on sentencing judge's misstatement of pure quantity of drug on one charge - Whether a different sentence should be imposed - Whether a Community Correction Order (CCO) combined with time served appropriate sentencing disposition.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Commonwealth offences - Desirability of national consistency - Applicability of state sentencing laws - Principles - CCO cannot be combined with a term of imprisonment for single Commonwealth offence - Whether combination sentence constitutes double punishment - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Pt 1B - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) ss 5(4C) 44

Criminal law - Sentencing - Commonwealth offences - Guideline judgment - Boulton inapplicable to Commonwealth offence sentencing - Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 68(1)(c), 80 - Inconsistency between guideline judgment and Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Pt 1B - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) Pt 2AA - Judiciary Act 1903 s 68(1)(c)

Ross (A Pseudonym) v Chief Commissioner of Police and Another45 VR 220

[2014] VSCA 254·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Warren CJ, Whelan and Priest JJA·17 Oct 2014·

Criminal law - Major crime offences - Investigation - Chief Examiner - Witness - Compelled evidence - Publication - Restriction - Prejudice to safety of witness - Order for release of restricted evidence - Challenge to release order - Test - Whether plainly wrong or wholly erroneous - Interests of justice - Attitude of future witnesses - Error in failing to accord procedural fairness of no consequence - Release also permitted for purpose of assisting prosecution of accused - No error in primary judge's approach to balancing interests of justice - Major Crime (Investigative Powers) Act 2004 (No 79) ss 43 43A 43B 67

Practice and procedure - Appeal - Competency - Leave to appeal - Major crime investigation - Compelled evidence given to Chief Examiner - Release order - Leave not required - Supreme Court Act 1986 (No 110) s 17A(3) - Major Crime (Investigative Powers) Act 2004 (No 79)

Salta Constructions Pty Ltd v St George Bank (A Division of Westpac Banking Corp Ltd)45 VR 245

[2014] VSCA 289·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Warren CJ, Tate and Beach JJA·19 Nov 2014·

Guarantee and surety - Guarantor - Discharge of liability - Bank loans to related companies - Mortgage security - Sale - Proceeds - Notice of default - Validity - Construction - Whether demand under guarantee - Whether demand clear and unambiguous.

McAleer v R45 VR 258

[2015] VSCA 4·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Priest and Beach JJA·4 Feb 2015·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Drug and firearm offences - Youthful offender - Sentence of two years' imprisonment with 10 month non-parole period - Whether manifestly excessive - Whether imprisonment only sentence available - Appeal allowed - Community correction order substituted.

Daniel (A Pseudonym) v Secretary to Department of Justice45 VR 266

[2015] VSCA 10·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Weinberg, Priest and Beach JJA·11 Feb 2015·

Criminal law - Serious sex offenders registration - Supervision orders - Gravity of non-compliance - Need for clarity and precision - Standard applicable to injunctions - Conditions - Reasonableness - Necessity - Reduction of risk of re-offending - Restriction on offender's activities as a magician - Prohibited from practising "magic tricks" on his own or in company - Too wide - Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (No 56) ss 15 16

Director of Public Prosecutions v Pace (A Pseudonym)45 VR 276

[2015] VSCA 18·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Priest and Beach JJA·13 Feb 2015·

Criminal law - Interlocutory appeal - Circumstances warranting leave - Common law principle - Non-fragmentation of criminal proceedings - No derogation - Trial - Judge ruling on admissibility of expert evidence - Trial judge refusing to certify appeal - Application for leave to appeal dismissed - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) ss 295 296 297

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Estrada45 VR 286

[2015] VSCA 22·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Priest and Beach JJA and King AJA·20 Feb 2015·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Crown appeal - Mitigation - Foreign nationals - Drug offences - Controlled drug - Methamphetamine - Conspiracy to manufacture - Guilty pleas - Precise origins of conspirators' recruitment unresolved - Sentences of five years' imprisonment with non-parole period of three years - Synthesis - Excess weight given to single factor - Offenders' isolation from friends and family whilst imprisoned in Australia - Sentences manifestly inadequate.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Newman (A Pseudonym)45 VR 302

[2015] VSCA 25·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Priest and Beach JJA·20 Feb 2015·

Criminal law - Interlocutory appeal - Evidence of accused's good character to be adduced at trial - Good character direction sought by accused - Agreement between prosecution and defence - Refusal of trial judge to give direction - Reliance on separate pending indictment against accused - Prosecution application for leave to appeal against refusal - Leave to appeal granted - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 110

Marks-Vincenti v R45 VR 313

[2015] VSCA 54·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Maxwell P, Weinberg and Beach JJA·1 Apr 2015·

Criminal law - Conviction - Aggravated burglary - Residential premises - Entry as trespasser - Limited right of entry granted by lessee - Exclusive possession - Premises also occupied by licensees - Licensees not entitled to revoke right of entry - Alternative basis upon which prosecution could be mounted - Dependent upon inference as to limited nature of lessee's permission - Conviction quashed and new trial, confined to alternative case - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 77

Gurappaji v Tonkin and Another45 VR 324

[2015] VSC 177·Derham AsJ·1 May 2015·

Administrative law - Judicial review - Certiorari - Error of law on face of record - Appeal from Magistrates' Court conviction to County Court - Possession of cannabis - Whether failure to provide adequate reasons - Administrative Law Act 1978 (No 9234) s 10 - Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (No 9719) ss 5 73

Practice and procedure - Judicial review - Application for summary dismissal - No real prospect of success revealed - Civil Procedure Act 2010 (No 47) s 63

Cotton (A Pseudonym) v R45 VR 341

[2015] VSCA 103·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Weinberg and Kyrou JJA·18 May 2015·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Current sentencing practices - Sentencing statistics and comparable cases - Worst case category of offence - Totality - Aggravation - Sexual offences against children under 16 - Incest - Indecent acts - Stepdaughter - Victim suffering severe psychiatric condition - Last incest offence occurred while victim on weekend leave from adolescent psychiatric facility - Total effective sentence of 13 years with non-parole period of 10 years - Sentence not manifestly excessive.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Brownlie (A Pseudonym)45 VR 362

[2015] VSCA 147·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Priest and Beach JJA and Dixon AJA·12 June 2015·

Criminal law - Interlocutory appeal - Theft - Elements of offence - Intention to permanently deprive - Pawning another person's property as security for loan - Sufficiency of evidence - Whether charges foredoomed to fail - Judge erring in granting permanent stay - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) ss 73(12) 73(13)

Deal v Kodakkathanath45 VR 372

[2015] VSCA 191·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Warren CJ and Ashley JA and Digby AJA·24 July 2015·

Accident compensation - Workplace injury - Breach of statutory duty - Negligence - Manual handling - School teacher - Removal of art exhibits pinned to classroom display wall - Unassisted use of two-step A-frame ladder - Both hands used to hold exhibits - Teacher descending backwards, losing step and falling on floor - Applicability of manual handling regulations - "Associated with" - "Hazardous manual handling" - "Musculoskeletal disorder" - "Use of force" - Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2007 (No 54) regs 1.1.1 1.1.5 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 - Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (No 107) ss 2 4 20

Practice and procedure - Trial - Jury - Claim for damages for personal injury - Workplace accident - Breach of statutory duty - Negligence - Action based on Occupational Health and Safety Regulations withdrawn from jury's consideration before completion of evidence - Test - Excision of particular of negligence alleging breach of statutory duty - Ruling premature - No appellable error.

Practice and procedure - Trial - Jury verdict - Whether perverse - Whether reasonably open on the evidence.

Saw Wah v R45 VR 440

[2014] VSCA 7·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Weinberg, Priest and Coghlan JJA·14 Feb 2014·

Criminal law - Sexual offences - Child under 16 years - Evidence - Admissibility - Relevance - Character evidence - Prosecutor alluding to likely reliance on evidence of traffic offences - Judge in error in ruling such evidence admissible by way of rebuttal - New trial ordered - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 110

Criminal law - Fair trial - Defence foreshadowing intention to lead character evidence - Prosecutor indicating that evidence of traffic offences would be led - Forensic judgment - Defence counsel mistakenly suggesting compromise approach - Defence electing not to lead character evidence - Adverse effect on presentation of accused's case - Prosecutor not justified in rejecting compromise that ought not to have been offered.

Papazoglou v R45 VR 457

[2014] VSCA 194·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Maxwell P, Weinberg and Priest JJA·2 Sept 2014·

Criminal law - Trial - Verdict - Validity - Jury trial - Requirements - Deliberations - Sufficiency - Majority verdicts - Note from juror to judge - One juror said not to be participating in deliberations - Whether individual juror required to participate in collective deliberation - No miscarriage of justice - "Deliberating" - Juries Act 2000 (No 53) s 46(2).

Legal practitioners - Counsel - Duty to ensure trial conducted with reasonable expedition, consistent with fairness - Inordinate length (75 days, including 38 pre-trial) - For longer than reasonably necessary for fair trial.

Kyriackou v Law Institute of Victoria Ltd45 VR 540

[2014] VSCA 322·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Warren CJ and Osborn JA and Ginnane AJA·11 Dec 2014·

Legal Practitioners - Legal practice - Lay associate - Practice manager - Trust account - Deficiency - Misappropriation and misuse of trust money - Serious misconduct - Complicity - Disqualification - Appeal against VCAT disqualification order - Tribunal not bound by rules of evidence - Sufficiency of evidence - Applicability of Briginshaw principles - Tribunal expressing reservations about solicitor's evidence - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (No 53) ss 98 148 - Legal Profession Act 2004 (No 99) ss 1.2.4(1)-(2) 2.2.5 2.2.6(1)(b) (2) (3) (4) (5) 2.2.7 2.2.8 3.3.21 4.4.2 - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 140 - Supreme Court (Miscellaneous Civil Proceedings) Rules 2008 (No 110) rr 4.15 4.17

Legal Practitioners - Serious misconduct - Penalty - Discretion - Relevant considerations - Lay associate - Conduct of defence of disciplinary hearing - Failure to give evidence - No showing of acceptance of responsibility - Matters wholly within knowledge of lay associate - Indefinite disqualification.

Administrative law - Merits review - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Appeal on question of law - Notice of appeal - Questions of law not properly specified.

Administrative law - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (No 53) s 98

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd and Others45 VR 571

[2014] VSCA 348·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Maxwell P, Neave, Redlich and Beach JJA and Kaye AJA·19 Dec 2014·

Tort - Intentional torts - Intimidation - Whether part of common law of Australia Effect of emergence in English law of tort of unlawful interference with business Decision of intermediate appellate court - No reason to doubt correctness.

Practice and procedure - Reserved proceeding or question - Court of Appeal - Proceeding in Trial Division reserved for consideration by Court of Appeal - Leave required - Single question of law - General importance - Appeal inevitable - Leave granted - Supreme Court Act 1986 ss 17B(2) (3)

Treasury Wine Estates Ltd v Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd45 VR 585

[2014] VSCA 351·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Maxwell P, Nettle and Kyrou JJA·22 Dec 2014·

Practice and procedure - Stay - Abuse of process - Group proceeding - Predominant purpose rule - Vindication of legal rights or immunities by judgment or settlement - Assessment - Fairness - Maintenance of public confidence - Obtaining payment of legal costs a corollary, incident, or by-product of successful vindication of rights - Proceeding commenced predominantly to generate legal fees for plaintiff's solicitor - Permanent stay granted.

Censori v Gillard and Another45 VR 605

[2015] VSC 106·Kaye JA·30 Mar 2015·

Prerogative writs - Habeas corpus - Plaintiff sentenced to death in Western Australia - Sentence commuted - Life imprisonment - Prisoner transferred to Victoria - Release on parole in Victoria - Further conditions imposed by Victorian Parole Board - Validity - Earlier proceedings in Victoria - Res judicata - Anshun estoppel - Issue estoppel - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) s 107 - Corrections Act 1986 (No 117) s 74 - Prisoners (Interstate Transfer) Act 1983 (No 9881) s 27(1)

Fletcher v R45 VR 634

[2015] VSCA 146·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Weinberg and Priest JJA and John Dixon AJA·15 June 2015·

Criminal law - Evidence - Admissibility - Discretion - Intentionally causing serious injury - Crown witness objecting to giving evidence - Witness excused from giving evidence - Witness's statement to police - Whether witness not available to give evidence - Tender of statement to police - Whether witness being required to give evidence contrary to Evidence Act - No error - "Not available" - "Required to give evidence" - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 18 65 135 137

Criminal law - Evidence - Admissibility - Evidence from accused's de facto partner regarding accused's bad character - Inadmissible as credibility evidence - Whether admission of evidence resulted in substantial miscarriage of justice - Conviction inevitable - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 108A

Wallis Nominees (Computing) Pty Ltd v Pickett45 VR 657

[2013] VSCA 24·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Warren CJ and Redlich JA and Davies AJA·20 Feb 2013·

Contract - Restraint of trade - Employer and employee - Public policy - Legitimate interest - Criteria - Reasonableness of restraint - Severance.

Appeal - Principles constraining new points on appeal.

Velkoski v R45 VR 680

[2014] VSCA 121·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Redlich, Weinberg and Coghlan JJA·18 June 2014·

Criminal law - Evidence - Admissibility - Tendency evidence - Applicable principle - Cross-admissibility - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 97 98 101

Criminal law - Trial - Failure to object to evidence - Deliberate decision for forensic reasons not to object - Waiver - Trial judge not under duty to intervene - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 97

Criminal law - Trial - Direction to jury - Adequacy - Tendency reasoning - Re-trial ordered.

Evidence - Admissibility - Hearsay - Exceptions - Whether fact asserted in previous representation must be subject of evidence by person who makes assertion - Complainant recants previous assertion - Evidence should therefore have been excluded - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 377(3)

R v Bright (A Pseudonym)45 VR 744

[2014] VSCA 341·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Beach JA, Kaye and Lasry AJJA·19 Dec 2014·

Criminal law - Interlocutory appeal - Pre-trial rulings - Absence of detailed reasons - Whether rulings sufficiently clear - Use of transcript - Jury directions - Cultivating narcotic plant in quantity not less than commercial quantity (2 charges) - Severance - Evidence - Coincidence evidence - Whether evidence cross-admissible - Necessity of determining what evidence admissible for what purpose on each charge - Prejudice - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 98 101 - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) ss 193 295 296 297 300

Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd and Another v Crown Melbourne Ltd45 VR 771

[2014] VSCA 353·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Warren CJ, Whelan and Santamaria JJA·22 Dec 2014·

Contract - Collateral contract - Lease - Renewal - Tenants seeking a ten year term - Negotiations - Landlord only prepared to renew for five years - Expenditure by tenants on refurbishing leased premises - Representations that tenants "would be looked after at renewal time" - Expiry of lease - Landlord refusing grant of further lease - Whether collateral contract made - Whether inconsistent with lease.

Estoppel - Equitable estoppel - Lease - Renewal - Negotiations - Expenditure by tenants on refurbishing leased premises - Representations that tenants "would be looked after at renewal time" - Expenditure by tenants - Reliance on statements - Whether representation sufficiently certain to found estoppel - Representation susceptible of range of possible meanings - Reasonable for representees to understand it as extending at least to lower limit of range of meanings.

Appeal - Appeal from Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Question of law - Precise identification of question - Question of mixed fact and law - "Question of law" - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (No 53) s 148

Little (A Pseudonym) v R45 VR 816

[2015] VSCA 62·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Priest JA, Lasry and T Forrest AJJA·17 Apr 2015·

Criminal law - Interlocutory appeal - Trial - Stay - Sexual offences - Sexual penetration of child aged 16 or 17 under care, supervision or authority - Application for permanent stay refused - Whether evidence sufficient to establish care, supervision or authority - Whether charges foredoomed to fail - Leave to appeal refused - "Care, supervision or authority" - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 48

Luciano v R45 VR 844

[2015] VSCA 173·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Redlich and Beach JJA·26 June 2015·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Victim impact statements - Inadmissible material - Judge stated that regard had to victim impact statements only so far as they were relevant and admissible - Counsel's obligation to object - No objection taken by offender's counsel on plea - Whether judge had regard to inadmissible material - Whether sentencing discretion miscarried - No error established - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) ss 8L 8Q

Director of Public Prosecutions v Ghazi45 VR 852

[2015] VSCA 188·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Redlich, Santamaria and Beach JJA·21 July 2015·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Director's appeal - Youthful offender - Five armed robberies - First two at age 17 - Remainder at age 18 - Offender sentenced at age 20 - Sentencing judge excluding general deterrence as consideration in respect of all charges - Whether Director must establish manifest inadequacy in order to succeed on a ground alleging specific error - Whether sentence manifestly inadequate - Importance of rehabilitation for youthful offender - Sentence not outside range - Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 (No 96) s 362(1) - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 289

St Kilda Arts and Events Company (Vic) Pty Ltd and Others v Apes with Wings Pty Ltd and Another45 VR 866

[2015] VSCA 199·(Court of Appeal) (2015) Weinberg JA and Garde AJA·24 July 2015·

Practice and procedure - Judgment and orders - Stay of execution of judgment - Test - Special or exceptional circumstances - Onus - No material provided as to basis for stay - No appeal against judgment on foot - Prospective appeal wholly speculative - Stay refused.