Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

40 VR(21 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Slaveski v R (On the Application of the Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of Victoria)40 VR 1

[2012] VSCA 48·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Warren CJ and Nettle and Redlich JJA·20 Mar 2012·

Criminal law - Procedure - Appeal against conviction - Abandonment by counsel - Accused subsequently representing himself - Application to reinstate appeal - Criteria - Unsupported denial of provision of instructions to abandon appeal - Leave to reinstate appeal refused.

Criminal law - Appeal against conviction - Contingent consideration of appeal - Contempt of court - Unrepresented plaintiff in civil action - Disruptive and abusive behaviour in court - Allegations of impropriety and corruption made against court and presiding judge - Threat to presiding judge - Natural justice - Whether ostensible bias - Accused seeking to obtain legal representation - Refusal of adjournment - Trial judge not in error - Grounds of appeal against appeal would not have been made out.

Human rights - Charter - Applicability - Fair trial - Criminal trial - Refusal of adjournment application - Court not acting in administrative capacity - Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (No 43) ss 4(1)(j) 7(2) 24 38(1)

Sentencing - Contempt of court - Disruptive and abusive behaviour in court - Allegations of impropriety and corruption made against court and presiding judge - Threat to presiding judge - Sentence of two months' imprisonment with further one month's imprisonment in default of payment of costs - No error in factors taken into account by judge - Sentence not manifestly excessive - Imprisonment in default of payment of costs erroneous - Appeal allowed in part - Accused resentenced to two months' imprisonment - Indemnity costs order.

Morgan v R40 VR 32

[2013] VSCA 33·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Maxwell P, Weinberg and Priest JJA·4 Mar 2013·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Totality - Offences committed whilst on interstate parole - Multiple counts of burglary, theft and drug possession - Sentence of five years' imprisonment with non-parole period of three years and six months - Unexpired South Australian parole not cancelled at time of sentence for Victorian offending - Offender potentially to serve eight years and 11 months' imprisonment with non-parole period of five years - Failure to take totality into account - Whether Victorian offending connected in time and character to South Australian offending - Such connection not necessary to invoke totality - Specific error established - Whether lesser sentence should be imposed - Appeal dismissed - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) s 5(2AA)(a).

Lingenberg v Gallichio and others40 VR 60

[2013] VSCA 143·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Nettle and Neave JJA·14 June 2013·

Accident compensation - Workers compensation - Impairment benefits - Assessment - Medical panel - American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment - Relationship between statute and Guides - Cervicothoracic spine - Aggravation of pre-existing anchylosing spondylitis - Total restriction of neck mobility - Assessment of nil impairment - Panel approach precluded by statute - Guides (4th Ed) s 3.3e, 3.3f(5), 3.3f(9) - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) ss 91(1) 91(7)(c)

Administrative law - Judicial review - Certiorari - Jurisdictional error - Error of law on face of record - Whether leave to appeal from refusal of order required - Competing authorities - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 O 56

Dragojlovic v R40 VR 71

[2013] VSCA 151·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich and Weinberg JJA and Bell AJA·20 June 2013·

Criminal law - Conviction - Trial extending over 11 months - Interruptions - Guilty verdict said to involve miscarriage of justice - Commonwealth offences - Defrauding the Commonwealth - Evasion of income and group tax liabilities - Lengthy presentation of Crown case - Adjournments - Absence of defence counsel due to illness and other reasons - Trial judge needing to interrupt trial to undergo surgery - Defence counsel's closing address lasting more than 15 days - Trial judge's charge occupying 16 days - Whether risk that jury failed to deliver verdict according to evidence - Trial judge inviting counsel to seek discharge of jury - Defence counsel declining to seek discharge - Considered submission, on instructions, that trial proceed - No showing of flagrant incompetence by counsel - Interests of justice - No miscarriage of justice - Convictions not unsafe and unsatisfactory - Ample evidence to support guilty verdicts - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 29D

Criminal law - Conviction - Trial - Severance - Co-accused charged with obtaining unauthorised access to computerised data - Judge declining to order severance - Counts subsequently severed after evidence led in respect of counts - Evidence led in respect of those counts ruled inadmissible and jury directed to disregard it - Whether trial judge erred in failing to discharge jury at that time - Relevance of deliberate decision by counsel not to seek discharge - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 76B(2)

Criminal law - Sentence - Defrauding the Commonwealth - Sentence of five years and four months' imprisonment manifestly excessive - Delay - Eight years from execution of search warrants until conclusion of case - Accused resentenced to four years' imprisonment with non-parole period of 27 months.

Nash v R40 VR 134

[2013] VSCA 172·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Maxwell P, Priest and Coghlan JJA·1 July 2013·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Consistency - Range - Current sentencing practices - Plea of guilty - Sentencing judge mischaracterising plea as late - Immaterial error - Intentionally causing serious injury - Assessment of gravity - Degree of variation in sentencing - Offender kicked and punched female victim in face - Serious permanent impairment of hearing - Driving while disqualified - Total effective sentence of seven years and six months with non-parole period of five years and three months' imprisonment not manifestly excessive.

Burke (A Pseudonym) v R40 VR 161

[2013] VSCA 351·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich, Weinberg and Priest JJA·6 Dec 2013·

Criminal law - Sexual offences against children - Sexual penetration of child under 16 - Evidence - Accused's record of interview - Jury question - Misdirection - Undermining evidential value of record of interview - Failure to give Azzopardi direction - Direction on effect of delay in terms of complainant's credibility - Failure to distinguish between directions of law and comments upon facts - Aggregation of defects - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 61 - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 20

Dupas v R40 VR 182

[2012] VSCA 328·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Warren CJ and Maxwell P and Nettle, Redlich and Bongiorno JJA·21 Dec 2012·

Criminal law - Murder - Evidence - Admissibility - Circumstantial evidence - Identification - Exclusion of prejudicial evidence - Probative value - Unfairness - Reliability - Christie discretion - Verdict not unsafe and unsatisfactory - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 137

Criminal law - Evidence - Admissibility - Expert evidence - Whether based on specialist knowledge - Dangers of identification evidence - General expert evidence as to dangers admissible - Specific evidence as to reliability of individual identifications not admissible - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 79 108C

Criminal law - Evidence - Corroboration - Alleged admissions - Prison informer - Pollitt direction - Weight - Verdict not unsafe and unsatisfactory - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 164 165

Courts and judges - Precedent - Court of Appeal - Intermediate courts of appeal - Comity - Uniform legislation - Uniform Evidence Acts - Construction by other intermediate courts - Departure - Only where Court of Appeal convinced other court's construction plainly wrong.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Jones (A Pseudonym)40 VR 267

[2013] VSCA 330·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich and Priest JJA and Robson AJA·21 Nov 2013·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Manifest inadequacy - Director's appeal - Multiple sexual offences by father against step-children and de facto spouse - Incest - Rape - Committing indecent act with child under care - Procuring sexual penetration of a child - Intentionally causing injury - Producing child pornography - Persistent violence, cruelty and depravity - Worst case category - Representative and rolled-up counts - Total effective sentence of 13 years' imprisonment with non-parole period of 10 years - No challenge to individual sentences - Proportionality - Totality - Cumulation orders inadequate - Sentence increased to 16 years' imprisonment with non-parole period of 12 years.

Criminal law - Sentence - Director's appeal - Competency - Director can appeal against total effective sentence - Manifest inadequacy constituting error - "Sentence" - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 287

Cummins (A Pseudonym) v R40 VR 319

[2013] VSCA 352·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich, Weinberg and Priest JJA·6 Dec 2013·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Manifest excess - Current sentencing practices - Sexual offences against children - Maintaining sexual relationship with child under 16 - Indecent assault - Non-penetrative offending - Sentence of nine years' imprisonment for maintaining sexual relationship with child under 16 - Total effective sentence of 13 years and six months' imprisonment with non-parole period of 11 years and six months - Such stern sentences reserved for cases involving multiple acts of sexual penetration - Appeal allowed - Offender resentenced.

Kosian v R40 VR 335

[2013] VSCA 357·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich and Coghlan JJA and Dixon AJA·6 Dec 2013·

Criminal law - Murder - Defences - Mental impairment - Test - Accused suffered from paranoid schizophrenia - Accused's perception of legal and moral wrongness of his actions - Defence rejected by jury - "Wrong" - Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 (No 65) s 20

Criminal law - Evidence - Expert psychiatric evidence - Two psychiatrists agreed as to accused's mental state at time of offending - Crown submission to jury that expert evidence would not assist them - Trial judge declining to direct jury that expert evidence should not be disregarded without logical foundation - Danger that jury would replace expert evidence with lay reasoning - Direction desirable alerting jury to dangers of applying standards of common sense and rationality used by sane rather than mentally ill person.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Murder - Two execution-style murders in public place - Twenty years' imprisonment with non-parole period of 20 years within range.

R v Chaouk; Attorney-General for the State of Victoria (Intervener) and Others40 VR 356

[2013] VSC 48·Lasry J·15 Feb 2013·

Criminal law - Attempted murder - Trial - Court's duty to ensure fair trial - Legally aided accused - Stay - Public interest - Risk that accused could not be assured of receiving fair trial - Instructing solicitor - Role - Legal aid for instructor for two half days of trial only - Contrast with Crown's resources - Trial judge not in error in finding lack of instructing solicitor likely to make trial unfair - Conditional stay granted until aid provided for instructor for duration of trial - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 197

Human rights - Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities - Whether appropriate to entertain Charter points on interlocutory criminal appeal - Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (No 43)

Legal practitioners - Criminal trial - Indictable offence - Instructing solicitor - Role - Workload of counsel - Necessary assistance for counsel.

Practice and procedure - Application for leave to appear as amicus curiae - Whether court would be assisted by submissions of amicus.

MK v Victoria Legal Aid40 VR 378

[2013] VSC 49·T Forrest J·18 Feb 2013·

Criminal law - Trial - Legal representation - Power to order Victoria Legal Aid ("VLA") to provide representation to accused person - VLA providing only limited assistance for instructing solicitor for trial - No jurisdiction to order VLA to provide for instructing solicitor for duration of trial - Jurisdiction limited to case of indigent accused refused funding and forced to proceed self-represented - "Legal representation" - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 197(2) (3)

Criminal law - Trial - Fair trial - Temporary stay - Criteria - Necessity for instructing solicitor - Equality of arms - Circumstances of case relevant - Power to order stay not precluded by statutory power to order provision of legal representation - Conditional stay granted - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 197(2)

Legal practitioners - Criminal trial - Role of instructing solicitor.

Azadzoi v County Court and Another40 VR 390

[2013] VSC 161·Bell J·12 Apr 2013·

Criminal law - Sexual offences - Child under 16 years - Committing indecent act in presence of child - Elements of offence - Intention - Whether absolute or strict liability - Whether honest and reasonable mistake as to age a defence - Conviction in Magistrates' Court - Unsuccessful appeal to County Court - Application for judicial review of conviction and sentence - Jurisdictional error - Error of law on face of record - Public recreational facility - Area reserved for persons aged 16 years or older - Three girls aged 15, 14 and 14 years admitted to area - Two complainants observing indecent act through doorway - Sufficient physical proximity - No basis for setting aside conviction - Third complainant in different room - Conviction quashed - "Presence" - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 47

Rodriguez v Director of Public Prosecution (Cth)40 VR 436

[2013] VSCA 216·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Warren CJ and Redlich JA·20 Aug 2013·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Aggravating circumstances - Purpose of offending - Using carriage service to cause offence - Communicating sexually explicit material - Offensive messages and pictures sent to undercover police officer - Offender's belief that recipient was 14 year old girl - Early offer of guilty plea rejected by Crown - Insufficient weight - Significant delay - Appeal allowed - Recognisance release order - Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) s 474.17.

Murdoch (A Pseudonym) v R40 VR 451

[2013] VSCA 272·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich, Priest and Coghlan JJA·27 Sept 2013·

Criminal law - Sexual offences - Evidence - Cross-admissibility of evidence of two complainants - Tendency - Coincidence - Concoction, collusion and contamination - Judge erred by admitting tendency and coincidence evidence - Judge failed to give adequate directions - Appeal allowed - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 97 98 101

Criminal law - Sentencing - Retrial - Judge erred in imposing higher sentence on retrial than that imposed following previous trial.

Berichon v R40 VR 490

[2013] VSCA 319·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich and Priest JJA and Robson AJA·18 Nov 2013·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Double punishment - Conspiracy to cause serious injury intentionally - Possessing an unregistered firearm - Judge sentencing offender for firearm charge and treating possession of firearm as aggravating circumstance of conspiracy - Error - No different sentence imposed.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Victim impact statement - Admissibility - Injury - Conspiracy - Proposed "home invasion" - Conspirators apprehended prior to entry - Home occupants not intended targets of planned assault - "Direct result" - "Injury" - "Victim" - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) ss 3 5(2)(aa) 5(2)(db)

Criminal law - Sentencing - Parity - Totality - Offender's prospects for rehabilitation - Sentences not manifestly excessive.

Priest v West (in his capacity as Deputy State Coroner of Victoria and Another)40 VR 521

[2012] VSCA 327·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell P, Harper and Tate JJA·20 Dec 2012·

Administrative law - Judicial review - Coroner - Obligations - Inquest - Reportable death - Cause and circumstances of death - Possible findings - Relevant considerations - Disappearance and death of small child in 1968 - Contemporaneous abductions and deaths of four other children - Evidence - Admissibility - Relevance - Coroner excluding statements concerning circumstances of deaths of other children - Person found not guilty by reason of insanity of murdering one of those other children - Coroner's finding that same person was in vicinity of last sighting of missing child on day she disappeared - Excluded statements not relevant as evidence of striking similarities between murders - Relevant as evidence of propensity to violent crime - Relevant as going to identity of person - "Must find, if possible" - Coroners Act 2008 (No 77) s 67(1)(b) (c)

Coroners - Inquest - Characteristics - Inquisitorial court with duty to investigate - Evidence - Admissibility - Witness - Compellability - Incrimination - Propensity evidence - Reliability of evidence relevant to objection - Distinction between salient facts and mere pieces of evidence - Whether coroner obliged to inform witness that certificate of immunity would issue if witness gave evidence - "Interests of justice" - Coroners Act 2008 (No 77) s 57(3) (4)

MA v R40 VR 564

[2013] VSCA 20·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Redlich, Osborn and Whelan JJA·14 Feb 2013·

Criminal law - Evidence - Admissibility - Expert - Specialist knowledge - Sexual offences against children - Expert evidence as to general behaviour of child victims - Relevance - Credibility - Weight - Counter-intuitive behaviour - Basis of opinion properly established - Probative value not outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 55 79 108C 135 137 - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 388.

Forster v Legal Services Board40 VR 587

[2013] VSCA 73·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Weinberg and Harper JJA and Kyrou AJA·11 Apr 2013·

Legal practitioners - Litigation - Duty of candour - Elements - Solicitor's conduct in resisting application for appointment of receiver to practice - Misrepresentation of nature of document exhibited to affidavit/evidence by legal practitioner party to proceedings - Failure to disclose to court known facts inconsistent with positive assertions made by practitioner's own counsel - Legal Profession Act 2004 (No 99) ss 1.2.6 2.4.4(1) 2.4.7(2)(b) 3.3.21(3) 5.2.2(2)(c) 5.5.1

Legal practitioners - Solicitor - Practising certificate - Refusal of renewal application - Fitness to practise - Review by Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) - Firm - Trust account deficiencies - Receivership - Judicial findings as to solicitor's conduct - VCAT ruling that issue estoppel arose out of judicial findings - Requirements of same parties and issues and finality - Error of law affecting VCAT decision - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (No 53) s 143(1)

Mokbel v R40 VR 625

[2013] VSCA 118·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Maxwell ACJ and Buchanan and Weinberg JJA·17 May 2013·

Criminal law - Fair trial - Extradition - Drug offences - Accused absconded during previous trial - Convicted and sentenced in absence - Accused extradited from Greece to serve sentence and to answer further charges - Challenge to legality of surrender by Greece - Unsuccessful resort to Greek courts - Application to European Court of Human Rights prior to surrender - Unsuccessful applications to stay trial following return to Australia - Surrender by Greece not in violation of European Convention on Human Rights - No improper conduct by Australian officials - Accused presented on fresh drug charges - No abuse of process.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Drug trafficking - Incitement to import - Many multiples of large commercial quantity of ecstasy, methylamphetamine - Thirty years' imprisonment, non-parole period 22 years - Applicant head of trafficking organisation - Worst category of offending - Sentencing range - Agreement between Crown and defence not binding sentencing judge - Sentencing judge mistaken about Crown submission on range - Whether error material - Whether different sentence should be imposed - Sentence not manifestly excessive.

Evidence - Foreign law - Proof - European Convention on Human Rights - "Foreign law" - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 174

International law - European Convention on Human Rights - Extradition jurisprudence - Interim measures - Reliance by Australian authorities on assurances given by surrendering contracting party - European Convention on Human Rights Art 34

Hunter v R40 VR 660

[2013] VSCA 385·(Court of Appeal) (2013) Maxwell P and Priest and Coghlan JJA·19 Dec 2013·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Murder - Brutality - Worst case category - Life imprisonment without parole - Appropriateness - Nature of the offence - Offender aged 47 at time of murder - Past history of offender - Murder conviction 26 years earlier - Similar aggravating circumstances - Concealment and destruction of body - Violent offending on parole - Risk of future offending - No sentencing error - Sentence not manifestly excessive - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 47) s 11(1)