Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

35 VR(37 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Ottedin Investments Pty Ltd v Portbury Developments Co Pty Ltd and Another35 VR 1

[2011] VSC 222·Dixon J·27 May 2011·

Practice and procedure - Civil Procedure Act reforms - Advancing interests of proper administration of justice - Overarching purpose - Summary judgment - Relaxation of pre-existing principles - No real prospect of success test - Plaintiff asserting rights on basis of untenable interpretation of statutory provisions - Facts not in issue - Full hearing on merits not required - "Just, efficient, timely and cost-effective resolution of the real issues in dispute" - Civil Procedure Act 2010 (No 47) ss 63 64 - Sale of Land Act 1962 (No 6975) ss 29A 29O

Sale of land - Cash contract - Purchaser's default - Contract varied - Further deposit required - Contingent liability to make further payment - Land subject to mortgage - Mortgage not discharged within 90 days - Whether cash contract became a terms contract on negotiated variation - Whether contract voidable by defaulting purchaser - "Terms contract" - Sale of Land Act 1962 (No 6975) ss 29A 29O

Director of Public Prosecutions v Johnson35 VR 25

[2011] VSCA 288·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Neave, Redlich and Bongiorno JJA·23 Sept 2011·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Director's appeal - Manifest inadequacy - Aggravated burglary, common law assault and breach of intervention order - Considerations relevant to punishing breach of intervention orders - Breach of parole - Interaction of s 16(3B) of Sentencing Act 1991 and totality principle - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) s 16(3B).

Azzopardi v R35 VR 43

[2011] VSCA 372·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Redlich JA, Coghlan and Macaulay AJJA·18 Nov 2011·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Youthful offenders - Principles - Large number of serious crimes over short period - Armed robbery - Intentionally causing serious injury - Reduction in mitigating effects of youth as seriousness of offences increased - Double punishment - Totality - Just measure that is no more than necessary - Proportionality - Verdins principles eschewed on plea - No obligation on sentencing judge to consider - Appeals allowed.

Quach v R35 VR 71

[2011] VSCA 390·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Warren CJ, Neave and Tate JJA·29 Nov 2011·

Criminal law - Rape - Accused a member of police force - Jury question as to whether accused prevented from calling character witnesses - Application for discharge of jury refused - Jury direction - Whether adequate - Whether conviction unsafe and unsatisfactory.

Manderson M & F Consulting (A Firm) v Incitec Pivot Ltd35 VR 98

[2011] VSCA 444·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Redlich JA and Judd AJA·9 Dec 2011·

Confidential information - Concept or idea - Equity - Confidence - Breach - Model for restructuring and financing long-term asset leases - Statement of claim - Adequacy - Amendment - Whether confidential information properly identified - Knowing assistance in breach.

Practice and procedure - Summary judgment - Whether cause of action disclosed - Whether no real prospect of success - Whether matter should proceed to trial - Conflation of contest over the adequacy of proposed pleading and prospects of success at trial - Civil Procedure Act 2010 (No 47) ss 63 64 - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 r 23.01

TAN v R35 VR 109

[2011] VSCA 427·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Neave and Redlich JJA and Lasry AJA·20 Dec 2011·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Commonwealth offences - Money laundering - Dealing with proceeds of illegal narcotics activities - Conspiracy - Aggregation provisions - Applicability - Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 11.5 11.5(7A) 11.5(7) 11.6.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Mandatory statutory criteria - Cultural background of accused - Family-operated enterprise - Proceeds of illegal narcotics activities transferred within Australia and to Vietnam - Vietnamese cultural norms - Daughter's filial duty - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16A(2)(m).

Criminal law - Sentencing - Co-operation with authorities after sentence - Parity principle - Procedural fairness - Misapprehension of counsel's submission.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Automatic forfeiture of property - Co-operation with law enforcement authorities - Whether such conduct - Whether mitigating factor - Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) s 320.

Lemoussu v Director of Public Prosecutions35 VR 148

[2012] VSCA 20·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Redlich and Mandie JJA and Kyrou AJA·24 Feb 2012·

Criminal law - Confiscation - Restraining order - Exclusion order - Entitlement to make application - Prior to conviction - Following conviction - Time limits - Confiscation Act 1997 (No 108) ss 20 35

R v Mokbel (Change of Pleas)35 VR 156

[2012] VSC 86·Whelan J·13 Mar 2012·

Criminal law - Pleas of guilty - Application to change pleas - Principles - Drug trafficking offences - Search warrants - Validity - Affidavits supporting warrants not sworn - Evidence illegally obtained - Admissibility - Statutory test - Desirability of admitting evidence - Must outweigh undesirability of admitting evidence obtained that way - Criteria - Onus of establishing miscarriage of justice - Erroneous belief that evidence obtained by search warrants was admissible - No evidence of why accused pleaded guilty - Clear case in favour of admissibility - Application refused - Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1958 (No 6246) s 165 - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 138 - Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Amendment (Affidavits) Act 2012 (No 4)

Middendorp v R35 VR 193

[2012] VSCA 47·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Redlich and Mandie JJA and Whelan AJA·22 Mar 2012·

Criminal law - Defensive homicide - Tendency evidence - Probative on count of murder and lesser alternative of defensive homicide - Probative value as to objective dimension of self-defence belief - Credibility of accused - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) ss 9AC 9AD - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 97 101.

Criminal law - Sentence - Defensive homicide - Head sentence of 12 years' imprisonment and non-parole period of eight years not manifestly excessive.

Chen and Another v Kevin McNamara & Son Pty Ltd and Another35 VR 207

[2012] VSCA 63·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell P, Redlich JA and Robson AJA·4 Apr 2012·

Building contracts - Domestic building contracts - Disputes - Legislative prohibition on arbitration of disputes - Construction of underground water tank on residential property - Builder purporting to refer dispute to arbitration - Validity - Whether building permit required - Whether water tank was class 10b structure under Building Code of Australia - Approach to classification of building and structure - No permit required - Reference of dispute to arbitration invalid - "Domestic building contract" - "Structure" - Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (No 91) ss 3 4 5(1) 14 54 - Building Act 1993 (No 126) ss 3 16 - Building Regulations 2006 (No 68) reg 1801 - Building Code of Australia cll 1.3.2 1.3.3.

Lew and Others v Priester and Others (No 2)35 VR 216

[2012] VSC 153·Davies J·24 Apr 2012·

Practice and procedure - Suppression order - Open justice principle - Necessity test - Family trust - Dispute about beneficial interests in loan accounts - Application for declaratory relief - Pending related Family Court proceedings - Alleged misreporting of pending Supreme Court proceeding - Non-publication order sought commensurate and co-extensive with statutory restriction on publication in Family Court proceeding - Protection of welfare of children - Parity between confidentiality orders in separate proceedings - Whether making of order necessary to prevent prejudice to proper administration of justice or to prevent endangering physical safety of any person - Order only to be made in exceptional circumstances - Cogent and probative evidence required - Supreme Court Act 1986 (No 110) ss 18 19 - Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 121 - Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (No 43) ss 17 24

Priest v West (in his capacity as Deputy State Coroner) and Another35 VR 225

[2011] VSCA 186·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Maxwell P, Harper JA and Kyrou AJA·23 June 2011·

Practice and procedure - Appeal - Leave to intervene - Friend of the court - Considerations relevant to grant of leave - Challenge to coroner's rulings at inquest - Attorney-General applying to intervene - Status as minister responsible for administration of Coroners Act 2008 - No basis for claim of specialist expertise - No suggestion parties unable or unwilling to adequately protect own interests or assist the court - Leave refused.

Tsang v R35 VR 240

[2011] VSCA 336·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle and Neave JJA and Sifris AJA·7 Nov 2011·

Criminal law - Commonwealth drug offences - Border-controlled drug - 3,4methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("MDMA") - Commercial quantity - Importation - Attempted trafficking - Conspiracy - Evidence - Admissibility - Hearsay - Telephone intercepts - Statements made by third person co-accused in absence of accused - Circumstantial evidence - Evidence of agreement - Co-conspirators' principle - Jury directions - Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) ss 11.1 302.2 307.1

Criminal law - Evidence - Accused able to speak English - Accused giving evidence in foreign language through interpreter - Prosecutor commenting to jury that accused had abused use of interpreter - Credit - Jury entitled to apply common sense - Jury directions - No miscarriage of justice.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Parity - Co-offender - Manifest disparity - Totality - Judge not required to take account of period of imprisonment served in Canada for unrelated offences.

Amaca Pty Ltd (Under New South Wales Administered Winding Up) v King35 VR 280

[2011] VSCA 447·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle, Ashley and Redlich JJA·22 Dec 2011·

Negligence - Occupier's liability - Asbestos cement sheet manufacturing plant - Duty of care - Existence and scope - Known risk of asbestos causing mesothelioma - Magnitude of risk - Occasional visitor - Jury directions - Breach of duty - Causation - Distinction between risk and causation.

Evidence - Expert evidence - Alleged exposure to asbestos fibres - Mesothelioma - Contribution of cumulative exposure to asbestos - Whether inference of fact concerning contraction of disease reasonably open to jury - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 80(a).

Damages - Negligence - Occupier's liability - Damages for pain and suffering - Whether amount awarded by jury excessive - Awards previously made in like cases - Wrongs Act 1958 (No 6420) ss 28G 28HA - Wrongs (Part VB) (Dust and Tobacco Related Claims) Regulations 2006 (No 47).

Practice and procedure - Jury verdict - Motion for judgment non obstante veredicto - Whether sufficient evidence of causation to support verdict - Whether judge erred in dismissing application.

Kocak v Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd and Others35 VR 324

[2012] VSCA 259·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Nettle and Osborn JJA and Davies AJA·23 Oct 2012·

Administrative law - Judicial review - Reasons - Adequacy - Statutory obligation - Path of reasoning from evidence to facts to conclusion - Conflicting medical opinions - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) s 68

Administrative law - Judicial review - Remedies - Availability - Certiorari - Error of law on face of record - Mandamus - Accident compensation - Medical panel opinion - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) s 45

Estoppel - Issue estoppel - Workers compensation - Entitlement - Medical or like expenses - Claim for declarations - Medical panel - Opinion - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) ss 45(1) 99

Karatjas v Deakin University35 VR 355

[2012] VSCA 53·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Nettle and Hansen JJA and Kyrou AJA·28 Mar 2012·

Negligence - Duty of care - Nature and extent - Risk of violent attack by third party - Employee - Employer providing cafeteria services to university - University directing cafeteria employee as to aspects of her work - Employee using university car-park - Employee attacked walking to car-park at night at end of working day - Poorly lit pathway - Recent reports of man loitering in vicinity of pathway - University's security services contractor aware of reports - Whether university owed duty to cafeteria employee - No duty as occupier - University's exclusive management and control of campus - University's statutory obligations as person having management and control of workplace to provide means of leaving workplace without risks to health - Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (No 107) s 26

LLW v R35 VR 372

[2012] VSCA 54·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell P, Weinberg JA and Williams AJA·4 Apr 2012·

Criminal law - Trial - Alternative verdicts - Jury required to acquit on principal count before delivering verdict on alternative count - No restriction on jury's consideration of alternative counts before verdict - Offence of sexual penetration of child under 16 not statutory alternative to offence of rape - Necessary to be alleged as separate count - Sexual penetration of child under 16 to be treated in the same way as statutory alternatives for purposes of law governing delivery of alternative verdicts - When appropriate to plead sexual penetration as an alternative to rape.

Criminal law - Trial - Fair trial - Jury - Deliberation - Questions for trial judge - Jury note revealing proposed numerical vote in favour of conviction or acquittal - Judge not informing counsel of contents of jury note - Denial of procedural fairness - Appeal - Trial may miscarry where jury left in state of uncertainty or confusion - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) ss 38 45 425(1) - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 239(1)

Harvey and Another v Mutsaers and Others35 VR 389

[2012] VSCA 69·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Nettle, Redlich and Hansen JJA·19 Apr 2012·

Town and country planning - Planning permit - Period of operation - Extension of time - Time for making application for extension - Expiry of permit - Planning authority refusing to accept application made after expiry of permit - "May ask" - Planning and Environment Act 1987 (No 45) s 69(1)

Administrative law - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Jurisdiction to disregard non-compliance with time limit - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (No 53) Sch 1 cl 62

Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd v R35 VR 399

[2012] VSCA 82·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell P and Bongiorno JA and Kyrou AJA·3 May 2012·

Criminal law - Appeal - Sentence - General deterrence - Occupational health and safety - Recklessly engaging in conduct placing person at workplace in danger of serious injury - Elements of offence - Foresight of probable danger of serious injury not foresight of probability of serious injury - Fatality - Employee required to drive truck with defective brakes - Defendant's culpability very high - Employer company fined $750,000 - Appeal dismissed - Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (No 107) s 32

Criminal law - Appeal - Sentence - Occupational health and safety - Duty to provide and maintain safe workplace - Breach - Company - Director - Company's breaches attributable to director's failure to take reasonable care - Director fined $120,000 - Sentence not manifestly excessive - Appeal dismissed - Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (No 107) ss 21 144(1)

Zhou v Kousal and Others35 VR 419

[2012] VSC 187·Vickery J·10 May 2012·

Judgments, orders and declarations - Supreme Court - Execution - Sheriff - Duties - Warrant of seizure and sale - Auction sale of real estate without reserve - Validity - Terms of order authorising sale - Inherent jurisdiction to set aside sale - Former common law writs - Fieri facias - Venditioni exponas - Continuing applicability of common law principles to statutory warrant - Sale of dwelling for $1000 - Judgment debtor's substantial equity - Whether bid reasonable - Sheriff's statutory immunity - Preconditions - Sale set aside - Sheriff Act 2009 (No 9) ss 7 13 24 25 - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 r 66

Equity - Unconscionable conduct - Special disability - Categories - Constitutional - Situational - Alleged difficulty with English language - Owner of real estate subject to compulsory sale by sheriff - Owner not under relevant disability - Purchaser not taking unconscientious advantage of execution debtor's disability - Sale not liable to be set aside in equity.

R v Guariglia35 VR 445

[2012] VSCA 105·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Nettle and Osborn JJA and Cavanough AJA·23 May 2012·

Criminal law - Procedure - Interlocutory appeal - Convictions prior to commencement of Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (CPA) quashed - Retrial to be had after commencement of CPA - Applicability of CPA - Presentment - Validity - Filed over after commencement of CPA - Crown required to lay indictments in accordance with CPA - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) ss 158 159 164 Sch 4 cl 9

Major Engineering Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd35 VR 458

[2011] VSCA 226·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Bongiorno and Hansen JJA and Kyrou AJA·9 Aug 2011·

Insurance - Contract - Construction - Legal liability - Legal costs extension clause - Costs of successful defence of product liability claim - Canting keel for ocean-going racing yacht - Control mechanism - Design, manufacture and sale of hydraulic cylinders - Specifications - Failure of cylinders - Capsize of yacht - Required nexus between legal costs claim and policy indemnity - Analysis of third party's claim as litigated - Exclusion clauses - Construction - No cover for treatment design and professional risks - Business context.

BSJ v R35 VR 475

[2012] VSCA 93·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell P, Buchanan and Hansen JJA·17 May 2012·

Criminal law - Incest - Father and step-daughters - Evidence - Coincidence - Cross-admissibility - Limited to similar evidence - Possibility of concoction - Relevance - Assessment of probative value - Trial judge ruling no real possibility - Probative value outweighing prejudicial effect - Sentence - No error in sentencing - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) ss 97(1)(b) 98(1)(b) 101

Tran v R35 VR 484

[2012] VSCA 110·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell P and Neave JA·22 May 2012·

Criminal law - Sentence - Verdins principles - Moral culpability - General deterrence - Causal relation between mental illness and offending - Brain injury - Depressive illness - Drug offences - Cultivation of cannabis - Theft of electricity - Reliance at plea on Verdins principles 5 and 6 - No reliance on Verdins principles 1 or 3 despite evidentiary foundation - No inconsistency between Verdins and Muldrock.

Aluthgamage v Select Care Personnel Pty Ltd35 VR 494

[2012] VSCA 111·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Redlich and Osborn JJA and Cavanough AJA·7 June 2012·

Accident compensation - Workers compensation - Injuries suffered in 2003 - Serious injury - Leave application dismissed - Loss of earning capacity - 40% requirement - Pain and suffering consequences - Fitness for work - Medical evidence - Conflict - Trial judge misapplying evidence - Former nurse aged 69 at time of trial - Qualified to continue working - Precluded from successful retraining - Court of Appeal deciding leave application for itself - No fresh evidence adduced on appeal - Very considerable loss of earning capacity established - "Suitable employment" - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) ss 134AB(37) 134AB(38)(b) 134AB(38)(c) 134AD

Re Centro Retail Australia Ltd35 VR 512

[2012] VSC 240·Almond J·8 June 2012·

Trusts and trustees - Powers - Judicial advice - Defence by trustees of legal proceedings - Compromise - Application for approval - Principles - Nature of procedure - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 r 54.02.

Dale Wallace v R35 VR 520

[2012] VSCA 114·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell ACJ and Buchanan JA·8 June 2012·

Criminal law - Sentence - Imprisonment - Non-parole period - Appellate review - Principles - Intentionally causing serious injury and criminal damage - Whether non-parole period manifestly excessive - Whether accorded with judge's stated intention - No "usual" non-parole period - Totality.

Eade v R35 VR 526

[2012] VSCA 142·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Maxwell P, Neave JA and Lasry AJA·27 June 2012·

Criminal law - Offences against property - Arson - Destruction of building by fire - Accused intentionally set fire to crates inside milk factory - Plea of guilty - No intent to destroy factory - No knowledge or belief that conduct likely to result in destruction of factory - Could not in law have been convicted of that offence - Indictment amended - Intentional destruction of milk crates - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 197 - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) s 165

Sentence - Criminal damage - Intentional destruction of milk crates - Unintended direct consequences a factor in sentencing - Custodial penalty not warranted - Four months already served - Youthful offenders discharged - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 197 - Sentencing Act 1991 (No 49) ss 3(1) 5(2)(daa) 5(2)(db) 73

Cardona and Another v Brown and Another35 VR 538

[2012] VSCA 174·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Bongiorno, Tate and Osborn JJA·13 Aug 2012·

Contract - Construction - Commercial expectations - Building contract - HIA Plain English New Homes Contract - Domestic building - Role of third party lenders - Staged progress payments - Builder's entitlement - Need for effective and satisfactory completion - Stages completed out of sequence - Completion of lock-up stage - Garage part of home and building works - Premature demand for progress payment - Premature suspension of works - Owners' demand for builders to return to work - Owners' repudiation of contract - Non-compliance with mandated contents of notices - Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (No 91) ss 3 5 40

Apostolidis and Others v Kalenik and Another35 VR 563

[2011] VSCA 307·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle, Ashley and Tate JJA·28 Oct 2011·

Real property - Domestic partners - Property interests - Adjustment - Jurisdiction - Whether adjustment sum ordered was just and equitable - On re-exercise of discretion, what adjustment order ought be made - Date of valuation of property - Property Law Act 1958 (No 6344) s 285.

Evidence - Appeal - Fresh evidence - Admissibility on appeal - Whether fresh evidence falsified basic assumption common to both sides - Whether to refuse admission would be an affront to common sense or a sense of justice.

Courts and judges - Jurisdiction - Property adjustment order - Whether court has jurisdiction to make order if it would affect third party creditors - Property Law Act 1958 (No 6344) Pt IX.

Costs - Appeal and cross-appeal - Each party succeeding - No order as to costs.

Costs - Trial judge departing from usual rule - Parties' conduct in interlocutory processes - Plaintiff engaging in improper conduct - Defendant engaging in dishonest conduct - Whether judge gave insufficient weight to improper conduct occurring in pre-trial period and during trial - Calderbank offer - Rejection - Consequences - Whether costs order need reflect the proportionate degree of success of a party - Leave to appeal refused - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 r 26.05(2).

Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd and Others (Ruling No 5)35 VR 615

[2012] VSC 66·J Forrest J·9 Mar 2012·

Practice and procedure - Group proceeding - Common questions of law and fact - Sample group members - Whether quantum of sample group members' claims should be determined at trial - Civil Procedure Act 2010 (No 47) s 9 - Supreme Court Act 1986 (No 110) s 33ZF

Practice and procedure - Group proceeding - Sample group members - Potential liability for costs - Declaration - Supreme Court Act 1986 (No 110) ss 33Q 33R 33ZD

Utility Services Corporation Ltd v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd and Others35 VR 628

[2012] VSCA 158·(Court of Appeal) (2012) Bongiorno JA and Beach and Dixon AJJA·24 July 2012·

Tort - Negligence - Defences - Proportionate liability - Pleading - Black Saturday bushfires (2009) - Kilmore East fire - Group proceeding against private electricity distributor - Alleged operational failure in transmission line component - Transmission line constructed by former State Electricity Commission (SEC) - Corporatisation and ensuing privatisation of Victorian electricity industry (1993/1994) - Legislative allocation of SEC liabilities to private distributor - Counterclaim by distributor against transmission line maintenance contractor - Contractor applying to amend defence to counterclaim - Contractor seeking to rely on distributor's allocated liability - Appeal against refusal of leave to amend - Amendment not futile - "Concurrent wrongdoer" - "Whose acts or omissions caused" - Wrongs Act 1958 (No 6420) Pt IVAA ss 23B 24AF 24AH 24AI 24AP

Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd and Others (Ruling No 8)35 VR 643

[2012] VSC 318·J Forrest J·27 July 2012·

Practice and procedure - Group proceeding - Mode of trial - Writ endorsed for trial by judge alone - Black Saturday bushfires (2009) - Kilmore East fire - Plaintiff requesting jury trial - Discretionary considerations - Complexity of legal issues - Interests of justice - Proceeding to be tried without jury - Civil Procedure Act 2010 (No 47) s 49 - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 r 47.02 - Juries Act 2000 (No 53) Pt 6

PRACTICE NOTE NO 1 OF 201235 VR 661

PRACTICE NOTE NO 2 OF 201235 VR 663

PRACTICE NOTE NO 3 OF 201235 VR 666

PRACTICE NOTE NO 4 OF 201235 VR 672