Unlimited digital access from $45/mo. Print subscriptions with bound volumes available.Shop Now

Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

31 VR(33 results)

Cases reported in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Haden Engineering Pty Ltd v McKinnon31 VR 1

[2010] VSCA 69·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Maxwell P, Buchanan and Nettle JJA·31 Mar 2010·

Accident compensation - Workers compensation - Leave to bring common law proceedings - Damages - Serious injury - Impairment - Evaluation - Fact, degree and value judgment - Imprecise adjectival criteria - Utility of check lists of relevant criteria - Need for consistency of application - Like cases to be treated alike - Utility of comparisons with earlier cases - Worker's stoicism - "Pain and suffering consequence" - "More than significant or marked and ... at least very considerable" - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) ss 134AB(16)(b) 134AB(38)(b) 134AD

Wood and Another v McLean and Another31 VR 12

[2010] VSC 550·Sifris J·8 Dec 2010·

Administration and probate - Proceeding on behalf of estate - Executor unwilling to take action - Testator leaving estate to one child - Testator's inter vivos transfer of largest asset to sole beneficiary - Claim by other children for provision from estate - Claimants alleging testator subject to special disability at time of transfer - Executor failing to act to set aside transfer on equitable grounds - Whether Pt IV claimants had standing to commence separate proceeding against executor on behalf of estate - Whether real financial or other interest - No standing as contingent beneficiaries - Summary judgment for the executor - Administration and Probate Act 1958 (No 6191) Pt IV.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Johnstone (No 2)31 VR 20

[2010] VSC 615·Cavanough J·10 Dec 2010·

Judgments, orders and declarations - Statutory and inherent power to amend - Criminal law - Road safety offences - Mandatory penalties - Driver's licence - Demerit point system - Magistrate's decision - Successful appeal on question of law by Director of Public Prosecutions - Authenticated Supreme Court remitter order - Judge not informed of respondent's demerit points - Application by accused to amend order fundamentally - Whether court would have made order sought had it been informed of certain facts - "Beyond controversy test" - Discretion - Delay - Amendment refused - Road Safety Act 1986 (No 127) ss 25 49(1)(b) 49(1)(f) 50(1A) 50(1AB) - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 1) s 412

Hasan v R31 VR 28

[2010] VSCA 352·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Maxwell P, Redlich and Harper JJA·17 Dec 2010·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Rape - Failing to answer bail - Sentencing principles - Intoxication - Not ordinarily a mitigating factor - Scope of "out of character" exception - Consistency in sentencing - Appropriate sentencing range - Instinctive synthesis - Current sentencing practices - Sentence of six months' imprisonment for failing to answer bail did not involve double punishment - Sentence of six years' imprisonment for rape manifestly excessive - Sentence of four years' imprisonment substituted.

Kheirs Financial Services Pty Ltd and Another v Aussie Home Loans Pty Ltd and Another31 VR 46

[2010] VSCA 355·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Maxwell P, Tate JA and Habersberger AJA·20 Dec 2010·

Costs - Discretion - Usual rule - Costs follow the event - Usual rule applicable to third and fourth party proceedings - Plaintiff's claim dismissed - Consequential dismissal of third and fourth party proceedings - Apportionable claims not fully determined - Apportionment of responsibility used as basis for determining costs of consequential proceedings - Costs should have followed the event.

Arafan v R31 VR 82

[2010] VSCA 356·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Maxwell P and Weinberg JA·22 Dec 2010·

Criminal law - Joint liability - Categories - Joint criminal enterprise - Blackmail - Multiple counts - Presence at commission of crime not required - Participation requirement.

Criminal law - Liability - Parties - Fair trial - Crown case opened and conducted on basis of aiding and abetting - Change of Crown position after close of case to one of joint criminal enterprise - Prejudice - Miscarriage of justice - Judgment and verdicts of acquittal entered.

Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd31 VR 100

[2011] VSCA 52·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Ashley and Tate JJA and Hargrave AJA·3 Mar 2011·

Accident compensation - Workers compensation - Leave to bring common law proceedings - Damages - Serious injury - Impairment - Evaluation - Fact, degree and value judgment - Worker's stoicism - Aggravation of pre-existing asymptomatic degenerative cervical spine condition and consequences of soft tissue shoulder injury - Consideration of consequences of impairment as a whole - Adverse credit findings when credit not in issue - "Pain and suffering consequence" - "More than significant or marked and ... at least very considerable" - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) ss 134AB(16)(b) 134AB(19)(a) 134AB(37) 134AB(38)(c) 134AD.

Watson and Others v Ebsworth & Ebsworth (A Firm) and Another31 VR 123

[2010] VSCA 335·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Neave, Mandie and Hansen JJA·10 Dec 2010·

Legal practitioners - Solicitor - Multiple clients with common interests - Retainer - Express - Implied - Criteria - Scope - Fiduciary duties - Loyalty and good faith - Whether duty arising independently of contractual retainer - No breach in continuing to act for existing client as matters not sufficiently related - Resort to other solicitors from time to time - Equitable compensation - Causation.

Contract - Construction - Objective test - Surrounding circumstances.

Chief Commissioner of Police v ABC31 VR 176

[2010] VSC 582·J Forrest J·23 Mar 2011·

Courts and judges - Practice and procedure - Witness - Previous identity - Protection - Statutory program - Chief Commissioner of Police - Cessation of protection at request of witness - Consequential altered entry in register of births and marriages - Prohibition on disclosure of information about register entry - Exception - Compliance with Supreme Court order - Application for disclosure order - Chief Commissioner seeking to adduce evidence in administrative merits review proceeding - Protective role of court - Manner of disclosure - Guiding principles - Protective statutory objective - Facilitating security of present and past participating witnesses and their families - Documents - Proper exercise of power required judicial inspection and approval - Public interest - Need to consider reconciling potentially conflicting statutory objectives - Former protected witness obtaining firearms licence - Witness Protection Act 1991 (No 15) ss 4 10(1)(c) 16 - Firearms Act 1996 (No 66) s 1.

Police - Chief Commissioner of Police - Statutory responsibilities - Witness - Protection program - Firearms regulation - Potentially conflicting statutory objectives - Chief Commissioner suspending and then cancelling licence - Witness Protection Act 1991 (No 15) ss 4 10(1)(c) 16 - Firearms Act 1996 (No 66) s 1.

Ristevski v R31 VR 193

[2011] VSCA 53·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA·20 Jan 2011·

Criminal law - Sentence - Guilty plea - Statement of agreed facts - Judge departing from agreed facts - Sentence passed based on aggravating feature not relied upon by Crown - Appeal allowed.

MA v R31 VR 203

[2011] VSCA 13·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Redlich, Weinberg and Bongiorno JJA·27 Jan 2011·

Criminal law - Interlocutory appeal - Leave - Criteria - Ordinarily inappropriate cases for leave - Short trials - Fragmentation - Effect on court's resources - Routine evidentiary questions involving exercise of discretion - Leave refused - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 1) s 295(3)(a).

Criminal law - Admissibility - Identification evidence - Evidence Act 2008 (No 47) s 137.

Naidu v R31 VR 212

[2011] VSCA 14·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Maxwell P, Weinberg JA and Ross AJA·2 Feb 2011·

Criminal law - Fair trial - Rape - Accused separately charged with murder of wife - Rape complainant to be called as Crown witness in murder committal - Refusal to adjourn rape trial until after murder trial - Advice of counsel - Accused electing not to give evidence in rape trial - Miscarriage of justice - Wholly exceptional case - Retrial ordered.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Janson31 VR 222

[2011] VSCA 19·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle and Neave JJA and Kyrou AJA·4 Feb 2011·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Director's appeal - Motor vehicle offences - Dangerous driving causing death (two counts) and dangerous driving causing serious injury (three counts) - Truck driver disobeying red traffic signal - Driver ceasing to pay attention to road - Gravity of offending - Sentencing judge erring in assessing offending at low end of scale - Current sentencing practices - General deterrence - Sentence of three years wholly suspended for three years and community based order of 250 hours over a two year period manifestly inadequate - Not appropriate case for exercise of discretion not to resentence - Offender resentenced to total effective sentence of four years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years.

Criminal law - Sentencing - Doubling of maximum penalty - Offences committed two days after increase came into effect - Recent increase in penalty not adequately taken into account.

Roleff v Chubb Insurance Co of Australia Pty Ltd31 VR 235

[2011] VSCA 21·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Ashley and Tate JJA and Hargrave AJA·9 Feb 2011·

Accident compensation - Workers compensation - Serious injury - Leave to bring common law claim - Loss of earning capacity - Pain and suffering - Comparator - Whether appellant permitted to index "without injury" earnings to time of hearing of application - Possible relevance of earnings of comparable workers outside "window" period - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) s 134AB(16)(b) (38)(e) (f).

Trevor Roller Shutter Service Pty Ltd v Crowe31 VR 249

[2011] VSCA 16·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Warren CJ, Nettle and Ashley JJA·10 Feb 2011·

Practice and procedure - Civil trial - Mode of trial - Jury - Parties' right to signify jury trial - Trial judge - Power to order trial by judge alone - Criteria - Case by case analysis - Good cause - Time and cost savings alone insufficient to deprive party of entitlement - Interrelationship between legislation and court rules - Inconsistency - Juries Act 2000 (No 53) s 24 - Civil Procedure Act 2010 (No 47) s 7 - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 rr 1.14 47.02 47.03

Kuek v Devflan Pty Ltd and Another31 VR 264

[2011] VSCA 25·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Neave, Harper and Hansen JJA·10 Feb 2011·

Costs - Indemnity principle - Receiving party's liability - Ascertainment - Solicitor - Retainer - Costs limited by agreement between lawyer and client - Specific discovery - Documents - Production - Costs judge - Powers - Whether remitter appropriate - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 rr 29.07 40.12 63.35 63.39(3)

McWhinney v Melbourne Health31 VR 285

[2011] VSCA 22·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Neave, Redlich and Mandie JJA·11 Feb 2011·

Courts and judges - Fair trial - Damages claim against hospital - Patient alleging negligent infliction of involuntary psychiatric treatment - Self-represented plaintiff - Procedural fairness - Apprehended bias - Prejudgment - Standards of fairness and impartiality - Duty of trial judge - Permissible assistance to litigant - Maintenance of neutrality between parties - Plaintiff declining judge's invitation to seek adjournment to obtain admissible evidence - Judge not adjourning proceedings on own motion - Intervention by trial judge - Whether excessive or unfair - Curtailment of plaintiff's opening - Inclusion of inadmissible evidence - Judge inviting plaintiff to give evidence on oath and not during opening - Trial judge questioning litigant - Cross-examination - Plaintiff declining to tender document - Inadmissible evidence directly relevant to central issue in dispute between parties - Denial of possibility of successful outcome - New trial ordered.

Wheldon v R31 VR 297

[2011] VSCA 83·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle, Neave and Tate JJA·18 Feb 2011·

Criminal law - Sentence - Recklessly causing injury - Discretion - Renzella - Relevant considerations - Doubly warranted detention - Accused on remand - Serving sentence for unrelated offending - Sentence period not taken into account - Appeal allowed - Accused resentenced.

El Bayeh v R31 VR 305

[2011] VSCA 44·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle, Neave and Tate JJA·25 Feb 2011·

Criminal law - Fair trial - Drug offences - Trafficking - Drug of dependence - Possession of trafficking equipment - Evidence - Destruction of evidence prior to trial not lawful - Prejudice - No suggestion of deliberate impropriety - Judge did not err in refusing to stay trial or exclude evidence - Accused not deprived of fair trial - Sentence - "Goods and chattels" - "Must" - "Unclaimed" - Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (No 9719) s 83 - Police Regulation Act 1958 (No 6338) s 122.

Johnstone v R31 VR 320

[2011] VSCA 60·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle, Neave and Tate JJA·9 Mar 2011·

Criminal law - Murder - Evidence - Consciousness of guilt - Edwards direction - Sufficiency - Accused's police record of interview - Whether omission a deliberate lie - Omission properly left to jury - Directions - Inadequate identification of relevant lies - Evidence - Admissibility - Appeal allowed.

Talacko v Talacko and Others31 VR 340

[2011] VSCA 71·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Neave, Harper and Tate JJA·18 Mar 2011·

Contract - Construction - Litigation - Settlement agreement - Breach - Purpose and circumstances of agreement - Dispute between siblings - Recovery of parents' expropriated land in Eastern Europe - One sibling seeking to retain entirety of returned land - Remaining siblings claiming equal shares - Evidential burden on sibling resisting equality of treatment.

Contract - Enforceability - Penalty - Equitable compensation - Defendant agreeing to transfer property - Plaintiffs agreeing to accept judgment for compensation in event of default of transfer.

Evidence - Admissions - Pleading - Allegations taken to be admitted in settlement agreement.

Practice and procedure - Judgment - Setting aside - Justification - Undertaking to court - Non-compliance - Fresh evidence.

Mustica v R31 VR 367

[2011] VSCA 79·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Ashley, Bongiorno and Hansen JJA·30 Mar 2011·

Criminal law - Drug offences - Trafficking - Large commercial quantity - Giretti count - Methylamphetamine and MDMA - Directions - Requisite intention - Accused's knowledge as to applicable quantity - Multiple dealings - Evidence of multiple telephone intercepts - Knowledge at some stage of dealings insufficient - Full contemporaneity between actus reus and relevant intention required - Appeal against conviction allowed - Jury's advantage regarding evidence - Jury considering verdict for 12 days - Permissible inferences - Open to jury to find amount trafficked exceeded applicable large commercial quantity - Open to jury to find accused intended from outset and throughout trafficking period to traffick in not less than large commercial quantity - Accused resentenced for trafficking in not less than commercial quantities - Sentencing statistics - Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (No 9719) ss 71 71AA - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 569(2).

Victorian Workcover Authority v Kagan Bros Consolidated Pty Ltd31 VR 386

[2011] VSCA 91·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Redlich and Bongiorno JJA·1 Apr 2011·

Costs - Discretion - Bullock order - Workers compensation - Victorian WorkCover Authority - Indemnity claims against two defendants - One claim unsuccessful - Whether claims interdependent or alternative - Whether unsuccessful defendant's conduct justified Bullock order - Accident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191) s 138

Commissioner of State Revenue v Gas Ban Pty Ltd (in liq) (formerly Capital Securities (Aust) Pty Ltd)31 VR 397

[2011] VSCA 89·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle and Mandie JJA and Hargrave AJA·6 Apr 2011·

Taxation - Payroll tax - Notice of reassessment - Reassessment - Validity - Conclusiveness of notice - Mutual inconsistency of earlier assessments - Whether tentative or provisional.

Companies - Winding up - Insolvency - Payroll tax debt - Collection and recovery - Statutory demand by Commissioner of State Revenue - Application by taxpayer to set aside - Existence or amount of debt - No genuine dispute - No other reason to set aside demand - Taxation Administration Act 1997 (No 40) ss 9 11 17 27 44 45 104 127 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459G 459H(1) 459J(1).

Pollard v R31 VR 416

[2011] VSCA 95·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Buchanan, Neave and Mandie JJA·8 Apr 2011·

Criminal law - Rape - Attempted rape - Sexual penetration of a child under 16 - Practice and procedure - Filing over of new presentment after complainant examined at special hearing - Sexual penetration of a child under 16 not an alternative verdict to rape - No prejudice to accused as result of new counts - Evidence - Consciousness of guilt - Discretion to exclude evidence - Probative value not outweighed by prejudice - Inconsistent verdicts - Open for jury to doubt only part of complainant's evidence - Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused - Crimes Act 1958 (No 6231) s 421.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Twenty Fourth Trengganu Pty Ltd31 VR 439

[2011] VSCA 92·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Nettle and Mandie JJA and Hargrave AJA·12 Apr 2011·

Criminal law - Confiscation - Tainted property - Exclusion - Motor vehicle registered in company name - Exclusion application by company - Offender held no office and had no interest in company - Vehicle purchased with money lent by offender to company - Primary possession of vehicle by offender - Whether company ownership a sham - Whether offender had effective control of vehicle - Confiscation Act 1997 (No 108) s 22(b)(i).

Roads Corporation v Love31 VR 451

[2010] VSC 32·Osborn J·23 Feb 2010·

Resumption and acquisition of land - Valuation - Assessment - Causation - Portion of parcel of land acquired for road widening - Remaining land used for agricultural and quarry purposes - Consequential loss of value of remaining land - Landfill potential of quarry holes - Prospects of grant of necessary land use permissions - Vehicular access - Market value - Hypothetical purchaser - Before and after acquisition - Highest and best use - Future industrial use value of land - Discounted cash flow analysis - Severance - Disturbance - Special value - Solatium - Environment Protection Act 1970 (No 8056) ss 4 16 38 40 44 50E 50F 50G 50H 50R 50RE - Extractive Industries Development Act 1995 (No 67) - Land Acquisition and Compensation Act 1986 (No 121) ss 30 40 41 43 44 90 - Planning and Environment Act 1987 (No 45) ss 4 7 149 - Valuation of Land Act 1960 (No 6653) s 5A.

Evidence - Admissibility - Expert - Land valuation - Governing principles.

Roads Corporation v Love (No 2)31 VR 551

[2010] VSC 154·Osborn J·23 Apr 2010·

Resumption and acquisition of land - Costs - Principles - Offers of compromise - Calderbank offers - Special circumstances justifying higher award of costs - Unreasonable conduct - Issues-based award of costs - Allowance for three counsel - Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 r 26 - Land Acquisition and Compensation Act 1986 (No 121) s 91.

Commissioner, Corrections Victoria v Knight and Another31 VR 567

[2010] VSCA 203·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Maxwell P and Nettle JA·13 Aug 2010·

Practice and procedure - Access to the courts - Vexatious litigant - Prisoner - Refusal of permission to have in-cell personal computer - Proposed judicial review application - Application for leave to institute proceeding - Claim for declaration - Proposed declaration foredoomed to fail - Whether more limited declaration available - Hypothetical controversy - Whether abuse of process - Decision to grant leave not attended by sufficient doubt - Supreme Court Act 1986 (No 110) s 21(4).

MWH Australia Pty Ltd v Wynton Stone Australia Pty Ltd (in liq)31 VR 575

[2010] VSCA 245·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Warren CJ, Buchanan and Nettle JJA·21 Sept 2010·

Contract - Construction - Intention of parties - Objective test - Deed of novation - Release from claims - Unambiguous language - Broader commercial purpose of deed - Prospective operation only.

Trade practices - Misleading or deceptive conduct - Deed of novation - Warranty of past performance - Causation - Reliance - No direct evidence - Inference - Inducement by warranty.

Practice and procedure - Procedural fairness - Abandonment of claim - Final submissions - Cursory argument - Case management.

Ludeman v R31 VR 606

[2010] VSCA 333·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Warren CJ, Buchanan, Nettle, Ashley and Redlich JJA·10 Dec 2010·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Application for leave to appeal - Ascertainment of sentence - Total effective sentence excluded - Non-parole period and orders for cumulation and concurrency included - Court may not make order with respect to individual sentence not the subject of a grant of leave to appeal - Sentence - Intentionally causing serious injury - Theft - Assault - "A different sentence" - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) ss 3 278 280 281 282.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Karazisis31 VR 634

[2010] VSCA 350·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Warren CJ, Maxwell P, Ashley, Redlich and Weinberg JJA·17 Dec 2010·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Director's appeal - Abolition of double jeopardy as relevant factor - Court's residual discretion to dismiss Crown appeals not affected - Affray, intentionally causing injury and recklessly causing serious injury - "Double jeopardy" - Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (No 7) ss 287 289 290

Criminal law - Sentencing - Director's appeal - Abolition of double jeopardy as relevant factor - Director's role in filtering Crown appeals not affected by amending legislation.

Statutory interpretation - Maxims - Expressio unius est exclusio alterius.

Nguyen v R31 VR 673

[2011] VSCA 32·(Court of Appeal) (2011) Maxwell P and Redlich JA·16 Feb 2011·

Criminal law - Sentencing - Federal drug offences - Commercial quantity - Border-controlled drug - Importation - Possession - Quantity-based sentencing regime - Sentencing range - National consistency - Role of offender - Reward received or anticipated - Sentence not manifestly excessive - Discount for promise of future cooperation - Quantum - Appellate review - Factual error below - Prevalence of offending - Judge's perception of increased prevalence of offence not supported by evidence - Not open to judge to treat offender's drug addiction as aggravating seriousness of drug importation offences - No different sentence called for - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 21E.