R v SU, KATSUNO, KATSUNO, KATSUNO, ASAMI and HONDA1 VR 1
Criminal law - Drugs - Importation of heroin - Conspiracy - Failure by accused to give evidence - Whether comments by prosecution and judge referred to accused's failure to give evidence - Whether strengthened conclusion that verdicts not unsafe or unsatisfactory - Mental intent - Inference from accused deliberately shutting eyes to suspicious circumstances - Evidence - Failure by prosecution to call witness - Whether miscarriage of justice - Evidence implying two accused had prior convictions - Whether high degree of need to discharge jury - Evidence of acts and declaration of conspirator - Admissibility against other conspirators - Acts and declarations after principal object of conspiracy concluded - Records of police interviews - Whether voluntary - Whether in compliance with statutory requirements - Whether admission of records of interview unfair - Self-serving exculpatory statements in records of interview - Deleted from record of interview by consent - Whether accused can lead evidence of statements - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss. 23B 23C 23F 23 G 23L - Crimes Act 1958 (No. 6231) ss. 399(3), 568(1).
Juries - Criminal cases - List of potential jurors with non-disqualifying convictions - List provided by police to prosecution - Whether jury representative and randomly selected - Exchange between juror and witness - Whether fair-minded observer could reasonably apprehend bias of juror - Commonwealth Constitution Ch. III s. 80 - Juries Act 1967 (No. 7651).
Sentencing - Relevance of co-operation with police - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.